Instability remains a challenging problem in both primary and
revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Dual mobility components
confer increased stability, but there are concerns about the unique
complications associated with these designs, as well as the long-term
survivorship. We performed a systematic review of all English language articles
dealing with dual mobility THAs published between 2007 and 2016
in the MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases. A total of 54 articles
met inclusion criteria for the final analysis of primary and revision
dual mobility THAs and dual mobility THAs used in the treatment
of fractures of the femoral neck. We analysed the survivorship and
rates of aseptic loosening and of intraprosthetic and extra-articular
dislocation.Aims
Materials and Methods
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a major orthopaedic
intervention. The length of a patient's stay has been progressively
reduced with the introduction of enhanced recovery protocols: day-case
surgery has become the ultimate challenge. This narrative review shows the potential limitations of day-case
TKA. These constraints may be social, linked to patient’s comorbidities,
or due to surgery-related adverse events (e.g. pain, post-operative
nausea and vomiting, etc.). Using patient stratification, tailored surgical techniques and
multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, day-case TKA might be achievable
in a limited group of patients. The younger, male patient without
comorbidities and with an excellent social network around him might
be a candidate. Demographic changes, effective recovery programmes and less invasive
surgical techniques such as unicondylar knee arthroplasty, may increase
the size of the group of potential day-case patients. The cost reduction achieved by day-case TKA needs to be balanced
against any increase in morbidity and mortality and the cost of
advanced follow-up at a distance with new technology. These factors
need to be evaluated before adopting this ultimate ‘fast-track’
approach. Cite this article:
Intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown
to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion
after joint replacement. Recently, there has been interest in applying
it topically before the closure of surgical wounds. This has the
advantages of ease of application, maximum concentration at the
site of bleeding, minimising its systemic absorption and, consequently,
concerns about possible side-effects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which included
14 randomised controlled trials (11 in knee replacement, two in
hip replacement and one in both) which investigated the effect of
topical TXA on blood loss and rates of transfusion. Topical TXA
significantly reduced the rate of blood transfusion (total knee
replacement: risk ratio (RR) 4.51; 95% confidence interval (CI):
3.02 to 6.72; p <
0.001 (nine trials, I2 = 0%); total
hip replacement: RR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.32 to 4.97, p = 0.004 (one trial)).
The rate of thromboembolic events with topical TXA were similar
to those found with a placebo. Indirect comparison of placebo-controlled
trials of topical and intravenous TXA indicates that topical administration
is superior to the intravenous route. In conclusion, topical TXA is an effective and safe method of
reducing the need for blood transfusion after total knee and hip
replacement. Further research is required to find its optimum dose
for topical use. Cite this article:
