We aimed to compare reoperations following distal radial fractures (DRFs) managed with early fixation versus delayed fixation following initial closed reduction (CR). We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to identify DRF patients aged 18 years or older from 2003 to 2016. We used procedural and fee codes within 30 days to determine which patients underwent early fixation (≤ seven days) or delayed fixation following CR. We grouped patients in the delayed group by their time to definitive fixation (eight to 14 days, 15 to 21 days, and 22 to 30 days). We used intervention and diagnostic codes to identify reoperations within two years. We used multivariable regression to compare the association between early versus delayed fixation and reoperation for all patients and stratified by age (18 to 60 years and > 60 years).Aims
Methods
There is no level I evidence dealing with the optimal period of immobilization for patients with a displaced distal radial fracture following closed reduction. A shorter period might lead to a better functional outcome due to less stiffness and pain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this period could be safely reduced from six to four weeks. This multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) included adult patients with a displaced distal radial fracture, who were randomized to be treated with immobilization in a cast for four or six weeks following closed reduction. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score after follow-up at one year. Secondary outcomes were the abbreviated version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score after one year, the functional outcome at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months, range of motion (ROM), the level of pain after removal of the cast, and complications.Aims
Methods
It is not clear which type of casting provides the best initial treatment in adults with a distal radial fracture. Given that between 32% and 64% of adequately reduced fractures redisplace during immobilization in a cast, preventing redisplacement and a disabling malunion or secondary surgery is an aim of treatment. In this study, we investigated whether circumferential casting leads to fewer fracture redisplacements and better one-year outcomes compared to plaster splinting. In a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, two-period cluster-randomized superiority trial, we compared these two types of casting. Recruitment took place in ten hospitals. Eligible patients aged ≥ 18 years with a displaced distal radial fracture, which was acceptably aligned after closed reduction, were included. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redisplacement within five weeks of immobilization. Secondary outcomes were the rate of complaints relating to the cast, clinical outcomes at three months, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (using the numerical rating scale (NRS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) scores), and adverse events such as the development of compartment syndrome during one year of follow-up. We used multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression for the analysis of the primary outcome measure.Aims
Methods
We performed a retrospective study to determine
the effect of osteoporosis on the functional outcome of osteoporotic
distal radial fractures treated with a volar locking plate. Between
2009 and 2012 a total of 90 postmenopausal women with an unstable
fracture of the distal radius treated with a volar locking plate
were studied. Changes in the radiological parameters of 51 patients
with osteoporosis (group 1, mean age 66.9, mean T-score –3.16 ( We found that osteoporosis does not have a negative effect on
the functional outcome and additional analysis did not show a correlation
between T-score and outcome. Cite this article:
We hypothesised that the use of pulsed electromagnetic
field (PEMF) bone growth stimulation in acute scaphoid fractures
would significantly shorten the time to union and reduce the number
of nonunions in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre
trial. A total of 102 patients (78 male, 24 female; mean age 35
years (18 to 77)) from five different medical centres with a unilateral
undisplaced acute scaphoid fracture were randomly allocated to PEMF
(n = 51) or placebo (n = 51) and assessed with regard to functional
and radiological outcomes (multiplanar reconstructed CT scans) at
6, 9, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. The overall time to clinical and radiological healing
did not differ significantly between the active PEMF group and the
placebo group. We concluded that the addition of PEMF bone growth
stimulation to the conservative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures
does not accelerate bone healing. Cite this article:
