The purpose of this study was to directly compare the Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) Mobile Bearing Hip System (Stryker, USA) and large femoral heads (LFHs) in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) at mid-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on survival free of re-revision for dislocation, any re-revision, dislocation, and the risk of metal-related complications. We identified 299 revision THAs performed at a single tertiary care academic institution from March 2011 to July 2014. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (n = 65), dislocation (n = 58), and reimplantation as part of a two-stage exchange protocol (n = 57) were the most common reasons for index revision. MDM constructs were used in 123 cases, and LFHs were used in 176 cases. Mean age was 66 years (28 to 93), mean BMI was 31 kg/m2 (18 to 55), and 45% (n = 136) were female. Mean follow-up was seven years (2 to 12).Aims
Methods
The rate of dislocation when traditional single bearing implants are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be between 8% and 10%. The use of dual mobility bearings can reduce this risk to between 0.5% and 2%. Dual mobility bearings are more expensive, and it is not clear if the additional clinical benefits constitute value for money for the payers. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dual mobility compared with single bearings for patients undergoing revision THA. We developed a Markov model to estimate the expected cost and benefits of dual mobility compared with single bearing implants in patients undergoing revision THA. The rates of revision and further revision were calculated from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, while rates of transition from one health state to another were estimated from the literature, and the data were stratified by sex and age. Implant and healthcare costs were estimated from local procurement prices and national tariffs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published utility estimates for patients undergoing THA.Aims
Methods
We investigated the variables which determine the outcome after triple osteotomy of the pelvis for the treatment of congenital dysplasia of the hip. We reviewed 51 patients (61 hips) with a median age at operation of 23 years who were treated with a Tönnis triple osteotomy. The median follow-up was six years with a minimum of two years. Eight patients (eight hips) required a revision procedure. Of the remaining 53 hips, the results were good or excellent in 36 (68%) when evaluated according to the Harris hip score (median 90 points), and 33 patients (65%) were satisfied with the procedure. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the incidence of complications such as nonunion at an osteotomy site influenced patient satisfaction (p = 0.079). The incidence of complications correlated positively with increasing patient age at operation (p = 0.004). The amount of acetabular correction did not correlate with patient satisfaction. In univariate analysis, the groups of ’satisfied’ and ‘not satisfied’ patients differed significantly in Harris hip score, age, incidence of nonunion at the osteotomy sites, complications and late revisions. In conclusion, the patient’s age at operation and the incidence of complications influence patient satisfaction after triple osteotomy, but the amount of radiologically evident acetabular correction shows no correlation to outcome.
