Malpositioning of the trochanteric entry point
during the introduction of an intramedullary nail may cause iatrogenic
fracture or malreduction. Although the optimal point of insertion
in the coronal plane has been well described, positioning in the
sagittal plane is poorly defined. The paired femora from 374 cadavers were placed both in the anatomical
position and in internal rotation to neutralise femoral anteversion.
A marker was placed at the apparent apex of the greater trochanter,
and the lateral and anterior offsets from the axis of the femoral
shaft were measured on anteroposterior and lateral photographs. Greater
trochanteric morphology and trochanteric overhang were graded. The mean anterior offset of the apex of the trochanter relative
to the axis of the femoral shaft was 5.1 mm ( Placement of the entry position at the apex of the greater trochanter
in the anteroposterior view does not reliably centre an intramedullary
nail in the sagittal plane. Based on our findings, the site of insertion
should be about 5 mm posterior to the apex of the trochanter to
allow for its anterior offset. Cite this article:
One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines. The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58°; 0.14° to 29.9°) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36°; 0.55° to 39.19°). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25°; 0.02° to 10.52°) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51°; 0.07° to 9.89°) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20°; 5.80° to 16.72°) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57°; 1.40° to 4.56°) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54°; 0.91° to 9.39°), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39°; 0.04° to 4.56°). There was no significant difference (p >
0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion. The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.
The cortical strains on the femoral neck and proximal femur were measured before and after implantation of a resurfacing femoral component in 13 femurs from human cadavers. These were loaded into a hip simulator for single-leg stance and stair-climbing. After resurfacing, the mean tensile strain increased by 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6 to 24, p = 0.003) on the lateral femoral neck and the mean compressive strain increased by 11% (95% CI 5 to 17, p = 0.002) on the medial femoral neck during stimulation of single-leg stance. On the proximal femur the deformation pattern remained similar to that of the unoperated femurs. The small increase of strains in the neck area alone would probably not be sufficient to cause fracture of the neck However, with patient-related and surgical factors these strain changes may contribute to the risk of early periprosthetic fracture.
Our aim was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability in the establishment of the anterior pelvic plane used in imageless computer-assisted navigation. From this we determined the subsequent effects on version and inclination of the acetabular component. A cadaver model was developed with a specifically-designed rod which held the component tracker at a fixed orientation to the pelvis, leaving the anterior pelvic plane as the only variable. Eight surgeons determined the anterior pelvic plane by palpating and registering the bony landmarks as reference points. The exact anterior pelvic plane was then established by using anatomically-placed bone screws as reference points. The difference between the surgeons was found to be highly significant (p <
0.001). The variation was significantly larger for anteversion (
