The aim of this study was to determine whether fixation, as opposed to revision arthroplasty, can be safely used to treat reducible Vancouver B type fractures in association with a cemented collarless polished tapered femoral stem (the Exeter). This retrospective cohort study assessed 152 operatively managed consecutive unilateral Vancouver B fractures involving Exeter stems; 130 were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 22 with revision arthroplasty. Mean follow-up was 6.5 years (SD 2.6; 3.2 to 12.1). The primary outcome measure was revision of at least one component. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for revision following ORIF. Secondary outcomes included any reoperation, complications, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and mortality.Aims
Methods
A possible solution for the management of proximal femoral bone
loss is a modular femoral endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the outcome
of EPRs in tumour surgery has been well described, the outcome of
their use in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The
aim of this study was to describe the outcome of using EPR for non-neoplastic
indications. A retrospective review of 79 patients who underwent 80 EPRs for
non-neoplastic indications was performed, including the rates of
complication and survival and the mean Oxford Hip Scores (OHS),
at a mean of five years post-operatively. The mean age at the time
of surgery was 69 years (28 to 93) and the mean number of previous operations
on the hip was 2.4 (0 to 17). The most common indications for EPR
implantation were periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 40),
periprosthetic fracture (n = 12) and failed osteosynthesis of a
proximal femoral fracture or complex trauma (n = 11).Objectives
Methods
Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is projected
to increase by 137% from the years 2005 to 2030. Reconstruction of
the femur with massive bone loss can be a formidable undertaking.
The goals of revision surgery are to create a stable construct,
preserve bone and soft tissues, augment deficient host bone, improve
function, provide a foundation for future surgery, and create a
biomechanically restored hip. Options for treatment of the compromised femur
include: resection arthroplasty, allograft prosthetic composite
(APC), proximal femoral replacement, cementless fixation with a
modular tapered fluted stem, and impaction grafting. The purpose
of this article is to review the treatment options along with their
associated outcomes in the more severe femoral defects (Paprosky types
IIIb and IV) in revision THA.
Peri-articular soft-tissue masses or ‘pseudotumours’
can occur after large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) resurfacing
of the hip and conventional total hip replacement (THR). Our aim
was to assess the incidence of pseudotumour formation and to identify
risk factors for their formation in a prospective cohort study. A total of 119 patients who underwent 120 MoM THRs with large-diameter
femoral heads between January 2005 and November 2007 were included
in the study. Outcome scores, serum metal ion levels, radiographs
and CT scans were obtained. Patients with symptoms or an identified
pseudotumour were offered MRI and an ultrasound-guided biopsy. There were 108 patients (109 hips) eligible for evaluation by
CT scan at a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (2.5 to 4.5); 42 patients
(39%) were diagnosed with a pseudotumour. The hips of 13 patients
(12%) were revised to a polyethylene acetabular component with small-diameter
metal head. Patients with elevated serum metal ion levels had a
four times increased risk of developing a pseudotumour. This study shows a substantially higher incidence of pseudotumour
formation and subsequent revisions in patients with MoM THRs than
previously reported. Because most revision cases were identified
only after an intensive screening protocol, we recommend close monitoring
of patients with MoM THR.
