We describe the application of a non-invasive extendible endoprosthetic replacement in skeletally-mature patients undergoing revision for failed joint replacement with resultant limb-length inequality after malignant or non-malignant disease. This prosthesis was developed for tumour surgery in skeletally-immature patients but has now been adapted for use in revision procedures to reconstruct the joint or facilitate an arthrodesis, replace bony defects and allow limb length to be restored gradually in the post-operative period. We record the short-term results in nine patients who have had this procedure after multiple previous reconstructive operations. In six, the initial reconstruction had been performed with either allograft or endoprosthetic replacement for neoplastic disease and in three for non-neoplastic disease. The essential components of the prosthesis are a magnetic disc, a gearbox and a drive screw which allows painless lengthening of the prosthesis using the principle of electromagnetic induction. The mean age of the patients was 37 years (18 to 68) with a mean follow-up of 34 months (12 to 62). They had previously undergone a mean of six (2 to 14) open procedures on the affected limb before revision with the non-invasive extendible endoprosthesis. The mean length gained was 56 mm (19 to 107) requiring a mean of nine (3 to 20) lengthening episodes performed in the outpatient department. There was one case of recurrent infection after revision of a previously infected implant and one fracture of the prosthesis after a fall. No amputations were performed. Planned exchange of the prosthesis was required in three patients after attainment of the maximum lengthening capacity of the implant. There was no failure of the lengthening mechanism. The Mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating score was 22 of 30 available points (18 to 28). The use of a non-invasive extendible endoprosthesis in this manner provided patients with good functional results and restoration of leg-length equality, without the need for multiple open lengthening procedures.
In skeletally immature patients, resection of
bone tumours and reconstruction of the lower limb often results
in leg-length discrepancy. The Stanmore non-invasive extendible
endoprosthesis, which uses electromagnetic induction, allows post-operative
lengthening without anaesthesia. Between 2002 and 2009, 55 children
with a mean age of 11.4 years (5 to 16) underwent reconstruction
with this prosthesis; ten patients (18.2%) died of disseminated
disease and one child underwent amputation due to infection. We
reviewed 44 patients after a mean follow-up of 41.2 months (22 to
104). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24.7 (8 to
30) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage score was 92.3% (55.2% to
99.0%). There was no local recurrence of tumour. Complications developed
in 16 patients (29.1%) and ten (18.2%) underwent revision. The mean length gained per patient was 38.6 mm (3.5 to 161.5),
requiring a mean of 11.3 extensions (1 to 40), and ten component
exchanges were performed in nine patients (16.4%) after attaining
the maximum lengthening capacity of the implant. There were 11 patients
(20%) who were skeletally mature at follow-up, ten of whom had equal
leg lengths and nine had a full range of movement of the hip and
knee. This is the largest reported series using non-invasive extendible
endoprostheses after excision of primary bone tumours in skeletally
immature patients. The technique produces a good functional outcome,
with prevention of limb-length discrepancy at skeletal maturity.
Extendible endoprostheses have been available for more than 30
years and have become more sophisticated with time. The latest generation
is ‘non-invasive’ and can be lengthened with an external magnetic
force. Early results have shown a worryingly high rate of complications
such as infection. This study investigates the incidence of complications
and the need for further surgery in a cohort of patients with a
non-invasive growing endoprosthesis. Between 2003 and June 2014, 50 children (51 prostheses) had a
non-invasive growing prosthesis implanted for a primary bone sarcoma.
The minimum follow-up was 24 months for those who survived. Their
mean age was 10.4 years (6 to 14). The incidence of complications
and further surgery was documented.Aims
Patients and Methods
Conventional growing rods are the most commonly
used distraction-based devices in the treatment of progressive early-onset
scoliosis. This technique requires repeated lengthenings with the
patient anaesthetised in the operating theatre. We describe the
outcomes and complications of using a non-invasive magnetically
controlled growing rod (MCGR) in children with early-onset scoliosis.
Lengthening is performed on an outpatient basis using an external remote
control with the patient awake. Between November 2009 and March 2011, 34 children with a mean
age of eight years (5 to 12) underwent treatment. The mean length
of follow-up was 15 months (12 to 18). In total, 22 children were
treated with dual rod constructs and 12 with a single rod. The mean
number of distractions per patient was 4.8 (3 to 6). The mean pre-operative
Cobb angle was 69° (46° to 108°); this was corrected to a mean 47°
(28° to 91°) post-operatively. The mean Cobb angle at final review
was 41° (27° to 86°). The mean pre-operative distance from T1 to
S1 was 304 mm (243 to 380) and increased to 335 mm (253 to 400)
in the immediate post-operative period. At final review the mean distance
from T1 to S1 had increased to 348 mm (260 to 420). Two patients developed a superficial wound infection and a further
two patients in the single rod group developed a loss of distraction.
In the dual rod group, one patient had pull-out of a hook and one
developed prominent metalwork. Two patients had a rod breakage;
one patient in the single rod group and one patient in the dual
rod group. Our early results show that the MCGR is safe and effective
in the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis with the avoidance
of repeated surgical lengthenings. Cite this article: