The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
has issued guidelines that state fusion for non-specific low back
pain should only be performed as part of a randomised controlled
trial, and that lumbar disc replacement should not be performed.
Thus, spinal fusion and disc replacement will no longer be routine
forms of treatment for patients with low back pain. This annotation
considers the evidence upon which these guidelines are based. Cite this article:
To evaluate the incidence of primary venous thromboembolism (VTE),
epidural haematoma, surgical site infection (SSI), and 90-day mortality
after elective spinal surgery, and the effect of two protocols for
prophylaxis. A total of 2181 adults underwent 2366 elective spinal procedures
between January 2007 and January 2012. All patients wore anti-embolic
stockings, mobilised early and were kept adequately hydrated. In
addition, 29% (689) of these were given low molecular weight heparin
(LMWH) while in hospital. SSI surveillance was undertaken using the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential
application of povidone iodine-alcohol (PVI) followed by chlorhexidine
gluconate-alcohol (CHG) would reduce surgical wound contamination
to a greater extent than PVI applied twice in patients undergoing
spinal surgery. A single-centre, interventional, two arm, parallel group randomised
controlled trial was undertaken, involving 407 patients who underwent
elective spinal surgery. For 203 patients, the skin was disinfected before surgery using
PVI (10% [w/w (1% w/w available iodine)] in 95% industrial denatured
alcohol, povidone iodine; Videne Alcoholic Tincture) twice, and
for 204 patients using PVI once followed by CHG (2% [w/v] chlorhexidine
gluconate in 70% [v/v] isopropyl alcohol; Chloraprep with tint).
The primary outcome measure was contamination of the wound determined
by aerobic and anaerobic bacterial growth from samples taken after
disinfection.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures of the odontoid peg are common spinal
injuries in the elderly. This study compares the survivorship of
a cohort of elderly patients with an isolated fracture of the odontoid
peg A total of 32 patients with an isolated odontoid fracture were
identified. The rate of mortality was 37.5% (n = 12) at one year.
The period of greatest mortality was within the first 12 weeks.
Time made a lesser contribution from then to one year, and there
was no impact of time on the rate of mortality thereafter. The rate
of mortality at one year was 41.2% for male patients (7 of 17) compared
with 33.3% for females (5 of 15). The rate of mortality at one year was 32% (225 of 702) for patients
with a fracture of the hip and 4% (9 of 221) for those with a fracture
of the wrist. There was no statistically significant difference
in the rate of mortality following a hip fracture and an odontoid
peg fracture (p = 0.95). However, the survivorship of the wrist
fracture group was much better than that of the odontoid peg fracture
group (p <
0.001). Thus, a fracture of the odontoid peg in the
elderly is not a benign injury and is associated with a high rate
of mortality, especially in the first three months after the injury. Cite this article:
