Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 7 | Pages 849 - 850
1 Jul 2007
Atkins RM

This editorial examines the influence of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the conduct of orthopaedic surgery. It proffers criticism and suggests ways of improvement.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1136 - 1337
1 Sep 2018
Griffin XL McBride D Nnadi C Reed MR Rossiter ND


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Jan 2021
Parker M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1328 - 1330
1 Aug 2021
Gwilym SE Perry DC Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 6 | Pages 625 - 626
1 Jun 2019
Price AJ Haddad FS Beard DJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1425 - 1426
1 Nov 2016
Reed M Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1141 - 1142
1 Sep 2014
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 7 | Pages 853 - 854
1 Jul 2014
Parsons N Griffin XL Stengel D Carey Smith R Perry DC Costa ML

The Bone & Joint Journal provides the latest evidence to guide the clinical practice of orthopaedic surgeons. The benefits of one intervention compared with another are presented using outcome measures; some may be specific to a limb or joint and some are more general health-related quality of life measures. Readers will be familiar with many of these outcome measures and will be able to judge the relative benefits of different interventions when measured using the same outcome tool; for example, different treatments for pain in the knee measured using a particular knee score. But, how should readers compare outcomes between different clinical areas using different outcome measures? This article explores the use of standardised effect sizes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:853–4.