Periprosthetic fractures are an increasingly
common complication following joint replacement. The principles
which underpin their evaluation and treatment are common across
the
The aim of this study was to compare the rate of mortality and
causes of death in Korean patients who undergo surgery for a fracture
of the hip, up to 11 years after the injury, with a control group
from the general population. National cohort data from Korean Health Insurance Review and
Assessment Service – National Sample Cohort were used. A ratio of
1:4 matched patients with a fracture who underwent surgery (3383,
fracture group) between 2003 and 2012, and controls (13 532) were
included. The matches were processed for age, gender, income, and
region of residence. We also undertook analyses of subgroups according
to age and gender. The mean follow-up was 4.45 years (1 to 11).Aims
Materials and Methods
Hip resurfacing has been proposed as an alternative
to traditional total hip arthroplasty in young, active patients.
Much has been learned following the introduction of metal-on-metal resurfacing
devices in the 1990s. The triad of a well-designed device, implanted
accurately, in the correct patient has never been more critical
than with these implants. Following Food and Drug Administration approval in 2006, we studied
the safety and effectiveness of one hip resurfacing device (Birmingham
Hip Resurfacing) at our hospital in a large, single-surgeon series.
We report our early to mid–term results in 1333 cases followed for
a mean of 4.3 years (2 to 5.7) using a prospective, observational
registry. The mean patient age was 53.1 years (12 to 84); 70% were
male and 91% had osteoarthritis. Complications were few, including
no dislocations, no femoral component loosening, two femoral neck
fractures (0.15%), one socket loosening (0.08%), three deep infections
(0.23%), and three cases of metallosis (0.23%). There were no destructive
pseudotumours. Overall survivorship at up to 5.7 years was 99.2%. Aseptic survivorship
in males under the age of 50 was 100%. We believe this is the largest
United States series of a single surgeon using a single resurfacing
system. Cite this article:
Between June 1991 and January 1995, 42 hydroxyapatite-coated CAD-CAM femoral components were inserted in 25 patients with inflammatory polyarthropathy, 21 of whom had juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Their mean age was 21 years (11 to 35). All the patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically at one, three and five years. At the final review at a mean of 11.2 years (8 to 13) 37 hips in 23 patients were available for assessment. A total of four femoral components (9.5%) had failed, of which two were radiologically loose and two were revised. The four failed components were in patients aged 16 years or less at the time of surgery. Hydroxyapatite-coated customised femoral components give excellent medium- to long-term results in skeletally-mature young adults with inflammatory polyarthropathy. Patients aged less than 16 years at the time of surgery have a risk of 28.5% of failure of the femoral component at approximately ten years.
Two major complications of hip replacement are loosening and infection. Reliable differentiation between these pathological processes is difficult since both may be accompanied by similar symptoms. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic ability of triple-phase bone scanning (TPBS) and positron-emission tomography (PET) to detect and differentiate these complications in patients with a hip arthroplasty. Both TPBS and PET were performed in 63 patients (92 prostheses). The radiotracer for PET imaging was 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Image interpretation was performed according to qualitative and quantitative criteria although the final diagnosis was based upon either surgical findings or clinical follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET was 0.94, 0.95 and 0.95 respectively, compared with 0.68, 0.76 and 0.74 for TPBS. We found that an image interpretation based exclusively upon quantitative criteria was inappropriate because of its low selectivity. The histological examination indicated that increased periprosthetic uptake of FDG in patients with aseptic loosening was caused by wear-induced polyethylene particles and the subsequent growth of aggressive granulomatous tissue.