Early evidence has emerged suggesting that ceramic-on-ceramic
articulations induce a different tissue reaction to ceramic-on-polyethylene
and metal-on-metal bearings. Therefore, the aim of this study was
to investigate the tissue reaction and cellular response to ceramic
total hip arthroplasty (THA) materials We investigated tissue collected at revision surgery from nine
ceramic-on-ceramic articulations. we compared our findings with
tissue obtained from five metal-on-metal THA revisions, four ceramic-on-polyethylene
THAs, and four primary osteoarthritis synovial membranes. The latter
were analyzed to assess the amount of tissue fibrosis that might
have been present at the time of implantation to enable evaluation,
in relation to implantation time, of any subsequent response in
the tissues.Aims
Patients and Methods
As metal-on-metal arthroplasty becomes more widespread, concerns are being raised about the potential dangers of metal particulate debris. We present the case of a benign psoas mass secondary to the presence of such particles. The mass was excised and the hip resurfacing subsequently revised to a total hip replacement.
The differential diagnosis of the painful total
hip arthroplasty (resurfacing or total hip) includes infection,
failure of fixation (loosening), tendinitis, bursitis, synovitis,
adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) to cobalt-chromium alloys,
and non-hip issues, such as spinal disorders, hernia, gynecologic,
and other pelvic pain. Assuming that the hip is the source of pain,
the first level question is prosthetic or non-prosthetic pain generator?
The second level prosthetic question is septic or aseptic? The third
level question (aseptic hips) is well-fixed or loose? ALTR is best
diagnosed by cross-sectional imaging. Successful treatment is dependent
on correct identification and elimination of the pain generator.
Treatment recommendations for ALTR and taper corrosion are evolving.
