This study describes the Osseointegration Group of Australia’s
Accelerated Protocol two-stage strategy (OGAAP-1) for the osseointegrated
reconstruction of amputated limbs. We report clinical outcomes in 50 unilateral trans-femoral amputees
with a mean age of 49.4 years (24 to 73), with a minimum one-year
follow-up. Outcome measures included the Questionnaire for persons
with a Trans-Femoral Amputation, the health assessment questionnaire
Short-Form-36 Health Survey, the Amputation Mobility Predictor scores
presented as K-levels, 6 Minute Walk Test and timed up and go tests.
Adverse events included soft-tissue problems, infection, fractures
and failure of the implant.Aims
Patients and Methods
The treatment of infected nonunions is difficult.
Antibiotic cement-coated (ACC) rods provide stability as well as delivering
antibiotics. We conducted a review of 110 infected nonunions treated
with ACC rods. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (67
patients) with an infected arthrodesis, and group B (43 patients)
with an infected nonunion in a long bone. In group A, infected arthrodesis,
the success rate after the first procedure was 38/67 (57%), 29/67
(43%) required further surgery for either control of infection or
non-union. At last follow-up, five patients required amputation,
representing a limb salvage rate of 62/67 (93%) overall. In all,
29/67 (43%) presented with a bone defect with a mean size of 6.78
cm (2 to 25). Of those with a bone defect, 13/29 (45%) required
further surgery and had a mean size of defect of 7.2 cm (3.5 to
25). The cultures were negative in 17/67 (26%) and the most common
organism cultured was methicillin-resistant Cite this article:
We investigated the fracture-free survival of long bones stabilised by a telescopic intramedullary rod (TIMR) in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta with respect to the remodelling status of fracture or osteotomy sites and TIMR regions, in order to identify risk factors for fracture. A total of 44 femora and 28 tibiae in 25 patients with a mean age of 5.0 years (1.9 to 10.5) at presentation were studied. There were six patients with Sillence type I, five with type III, 13 with type IV and one with type V osteogenesis imperfecta. All received bisphosphonate treatment at the same stage during the mean follow-up of 7.3 years (0.5 to 18.1). The fracture-free survival was estimated at 6.2 years (95% confidence interval 5.1 to 7.3) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. More than half the fracture or osteotomy sites remained in a less-remodelled state at the latest follow-up or time of fracture. Of the 33 fractures, 29 (87.9%) occurred in long bones containing a less-remodelled site, and these fractures were located at this site. The relative fracture risk at the rod tip was significantly greater than in any other TIMR region (p <
0.001), and this was higher in bone segments having a less-remodelled site. This study shows a persistent fracture risk in TIMR-stabilised long bones, especially at less-remodelled fracture or osteotomy sites and at the rod tip.
Our aim in this prospective study was to determine the best diagnostic method for discriminating between patients with and without osteochondral lesions of the talus, with special relevance to the value of MRI compared with the new technique of multidetector helical CT. We compared the diagnostic value of history, physical examination and standard radiography, a 4 cm heel-rise view, helical CT, MRI, and diagnostic arthroscopy for simultaneous detection or exclusion of osteochondral lesions of the talus. A consecutive series of 103 patients (104 ankles) with chronic ankle pain was included in this study. Of these, 29 with 35 osteochondral lesions were identified. Twenty-seven lesions were located in the talus. Our findings showed that helical CT, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy were significantly better than history, physical examination and standard radiography for detecting or excluding an osteochondral lesion. Also, MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy performed better than a mortise view with a 4 cm heel-rise. We did not find a statistically significant difference between helical CT and MRI. Diagnostic arthroscopy did not perform better than helical CT and MRI for detecting or excluding an osteochondral lesion.