The aims of this study were to investigate the ability to kneel after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, and its effect on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary aims included identifying which kneeling positions were most important to patients, and the influence of radiological parameters on the ability to kneel before and after TKA. This prospective longitudinal study involved 209 patients who underwent single radius cruciate-retaining TKA without patellar resurfacing. Preoperative EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the ability to achieve four kneeling positions were assessed including a single leg kneel, a double leg kneel, a high-flexion kneel, and a praying position. The severity of radiological osteoarthritis (OA) was graded and the pattern of OA was recorded intraoperatively. The flexion of the femoral component, posterior condylar offset, and anterior femoral offset were measured radiologically. At two to four years postoperatively, 151 patients with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD 9.44) were included. Their mean BMI was 30.4 kg/m2 (SD 5.36) and 60 were male (40%). They completed EQ-5D, OKS, and Kujala scores, assessments of the ability to kneel, and a visual analogue scale for anterior knee pain and satisfaction.Aims
Methods
Although knee osteoarthritis (OA) is diagnosed and monitored radiologically, actual full-thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) has rarely been correlated with radiological classification. This study aims to analyze which classification system correlates best with FTCL and to assess their reliability. A prospective study of 300 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for OA (mean age 69 years (44 to 91; standard deviation (SD) 9.5), 178 (59%) female). Two blinded examiners independently graded preoperative radiographs using five common systems: Kellgren-Lawrence (KL); International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC); Fairbank; Brandt; and Ahlbäck. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intraoperatively, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) status and the presence of FTCL in 16 regions of interest were recorded. Radiological classification and FTCL were correlated using the Spearman correlation coefficient.Aims
Methods
There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of alternative polyethylene bearings in modular, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare standard polyethylene (SP) and highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLP) tibial liners in posterior-stabilized TKA, with osteolysis as the primary outcome and clinical results and the rate of re-operation as the secondary outcomes. This is a single-surgeon, prospective randomized study involving one design of modular posterior-stabilized TKA. An analysis of 122 TKAs with an SP compression moulded liner and 123 with an XLP liner was performed, with a mean follow-up of six years (2 to 11). Patients were evaluated clinically using the Knee Society score, Lower Extremity Activity Score (LEAS), and the presence of an effusion, and standard radiographs were assessed for radiolucent lines and osteolytic lesions.Aims
Patients and Methods
Although it has been suggested that the outcome
after revision of a unicondylar knee replacement (UKR) to total knee
replacement (TKR) is better when the mechanism of failure is understood,
a comparative study on this subject has not been undertaken. A total of 30 patients (30 knees) who underwent revision of their
unsatisfactory UKR to TKR were included in the study: 15 patients
with unexplained pain comprised group A and 15 patients with a defined
cause for pain formed group B. The Oxford knee score (OKS), visual
analogue scale for pain (VAS) and patient satisfaction were assessed before
revision and at one year after revision, and compared between the
groups. The mean OKS improved from 19 (10 to 30) to 25 (11 to 41) in
group A and from 23 (11 to 45) to 38 (20 to 48) in group B. The
mean VAS improved from 7.7 (5 to 10) to 5.4 (1 to 8) in group A
and from 7.4 (2 to 9) to 1.7 (0 to 8) in group B. There was a statistically
significant difference between the mean improvements in each group
for both OKS (p = 0.022) and VAS (p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis
in group A, performed in order to define a patient factor that predicts
outcome of revision surgery in patients with unexplained pain, showed
no pre-operative differences between both subgroups. These results may be used to inform patients about what to expect
from revision surgery, highlighting that revision of UKR to TKR
for unexplained pain generally results in a less favourable outcome
than revision for a known cause of pain. Cite this article:
The clinical diagnosis of a partial tear of the
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is still subject to debate. Little
is known about the contribution of each ACL bundle during the Lachman
test. We investigated this using six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower
limbs. Screws were placed in the femora and tibiae as fixed landmarks
for digitisation of the bone positions. The femur was secured horizontally
in a clamp. A metal hook was screwed to the tibial tubercle and
used to apply a load of 150 N directed anteroposteriorly to the
tibia to simulate the Lachman test. The knees then received constant
axial compression and 3D knee kinematic data were collected by digitising
the screw head positions in 30° flexion under each test condition.
Measurements of tibial translation and rotation were made, first with
the ACL intact, then after sequential cutting of the ACL bundles,
and finally after complete division of the ACL. Two-way analysis
of variance analysis was performed. During the Lachman test, in all knees and in all test conditions,
lateral tibial translation exceeded that on the medial side. With
an intact ACL, both anterior and lateral tibial landmarks translated
significantly more than those on the medial side (p <
0.001).
With sequential division of the ACL bundles, selective cutting of
the posterolateral bundle (PLB) did not increase translation of
any landmark compared with when the ACL remained intact. Cutting the
anteromedial bundle (AMB) resulted in an increased anterior translation
of all landmarks. Compared to the intact ACL, when the ACL was fully
transected a significant increase in anterior translation of all
landmarks occurred (p <
0.001). However, anterior tibial translation
was almost identical after AMB or complete ACL division. We found that the AMB confers its most significant contribution
to tibial translation during the Lachman test, whereas the PLB has
a negligible effect on anterior translation. Section of the PLB
had a greater effect on increasing the internal rotation of the
tibia than the AMB. However, its contribution of a mean of 2.8°
amplitude remains low. The clinical relevance of our investigation
suggests that, based on anterior tibial translation only, one cannot distinguish
between a full ACL and an isolated AMB tear. Isolated PLB tears
cannot be detected solely by the Lachman test, as this bundle probably
contributes more resistance to the pivot shift.
