Exsanguination is the second most common cause
of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of
haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial,
as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons
on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation.
Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents
or halts the progression of the trauma-induced coagulopathy, remains
unknown. Although early and aggressive use of blood products in
these patients appears to improve survival, over-enthusiastic resuscitative
measures may not be the safest strategy. This paper provides an overview of the classification of pelvic
injuries and the current evidence on best-practice management of
high-energy pelvic fractures, including resuscitation, transfusion
of blood components, monitoring of coagulopathy, and procedural
interventions including pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, external
fixation and angiographic embolisation. Cite this article:
To assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compares three treatments for acetabular fractures in older patients: surgical fixation, surgical fixation and hip arthroplasty (fix-and-replace), and non-surgical treatment. Patients were recruited from seven UK NHS centres and randomized to a three-arm pilot trial if aged older than 60 years and had a displaced acetabular fracture. Feasibility outcomes included patients’ willingness to participate, clinicians’ capability to recruit, and dropout rates. The primary clinical outcome measure was the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) at six months. Secondary outcomes were Oxford Hip Score, Disability Rating Index, blood loss, and radiological and mobility assessments.Aims
Methods
There have been many advances in the resuscitation
and early management of patients with severe injuries during the
last decade. These have come about as a result of the reorganisation
of civilian trauma services in countries such as Germany, Australia
and the United States, where the development of trauma systems has
allowed a concentration of expertise and research. The continuing
conflicts in the Middle East have also generated a significant increase
in expertise in the management of severe injuries, and soldiers
now survive injuries that would have been fatal in previous wars.
This military experience is being translated into civilian practice. The aim of this paper is to give orthopaedic surgeons a practical,
evidence-based guide to the current management of patients with
severe, multiple injuries. It must be emphasised that this depends
upon the expertise, experience and facilities available within the
local health-care system, and that the proposed guidelines will
inevitably have to be adapted to suit the local resources.
The types of explosive devices used in warfare
and the pattern of war wounds have changed in recent years. There has,
for instance, been a considerable increase in high amputation of
the lower limb and unsalvageable leg injuries combined with pelvic
trauma. The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan prompted the Department
of Military Surgery and Trauma in the United Kingdom to establish
working groups to promote the development of best practice and act
as a focus for research. In this review, we present lessons learnt in the initial care
of military personnel sustaining major orthopaedic trauma in the
Middle East.
The open blast fracture of the pelvis is considered
to be the most severe injury within the spectrum of battlefield trauma.
We report our experience of 29 consecutive patients who had sustained
this injury in Afghanistan between 2008 and 2010. Their median new
injury severity score (NISS) was 41 (8 to 75), and mean blood requirement
in the first 24 hours was 60.3 units (0 to 224). In addition to
their orthopaedic injury, six had an associated vascular injury, seven
had a bowel injury, 11 had a genital injury and seven had a bladder
injury. In all, eight fractures were managed definitively with external
fixation and seven required internal fixation. Of those patients
who underwent internal fixation, four required removal of metalwork
for infection. Faecal diversion was performed in nine cases. The
median length of hospital stay following emergency repatriation
to the United Kingdom was 70.5 days (5 to 357) and the mean total
operating time was 29.6 hours (5 to 187). At a mean follow-up of
20.3 months (13.2 to 29.9), 24 patients (82.8%) were able to walk
and 26 (89.7%) had clinical and radiological evidence of stability
of the pelvic ring. As a result of the increase in terrorism, injuries that were
previously confined exclusively to warfare can now occur anywhere,
with civilian surgeons who are involved in trauma care potentially
required to manage similar injuries. Our study demonstrates that
the management of this injury pattern demands huge resources and significant
multidisciplinary input. Given the nature of the soft-tissue injury,
we would advocate external fixation as the preferred management
of these fractures. With the advent of emerging wound and faecal
management techniques, we do not believe that faecal diversion is
necessary in all cases.
