Knowledge on total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in patients with a history of poliomyelitis is limited. This study compared implant survivorship and clinical outcomes among affected and unaffected limbs in patients with sequelae of poliomyelitis undergoing TKAs. A retrospective review of our total joint registry identified 94 patients with post-polio syndrome undergoing 116 primary TKAs between January 2000 and December 2019. The mean age was 70 years (33 to 86) with 56% males (n = 65) and a mean BMI of 31 kg/m2 (18 to 49). Rotating hinge TKAs were used in 14 of 63 affected limbs (22%), but not in any of the 53 unaffected limbs. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were completed. The mean follow-up was eight years (2 to 19).Aims
Methods
It has previously been shown that higher-volume hospitals have better outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). We were unable to identify any studies which investigated the effect of surgeon volume on the outcome of rTKA. We sought to investigate whether patients of high-volume (HV) rTKA surgeons have better outcomes following this procedure compared with those of low-volume (LV) surgeons. This retrospective study involved patients who underwent aseptic unilateral rTKA between January 2016 and March 2019, using the database of a large urban academic medical centre. Surgeons who performed ≥ 19 aseptic rTKAs per year during the study period were considered HV and those who performed < 19 per year were considered LV. Demographic characteristics, surgical factors, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.Aims
Methods
We evaluated the impact of pre-coating the tibial
component with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) on implant survival
in a cohort of 16 548 primary NexGen total knee replacements (TKRs)
in 14 113 patients. In 13 835 TKRs a pre-coated tray was used while
in 2713 TKRs the non-pre-coated version of the same tray was used.
All the TKRs were performed between 2001 and 2009 and were cemented.
TKRs implanted with a pre-coated tibial component had a lower cumulative
survival than those with a non-pre-coated tibial component (p =
0.01). After adjusting for diagnosis, age, gender, body mass index,
American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, femoral coupling design, surgeon
volume and hospital volume, pre-coating was an independent risk
factor for all-cause aseptic revision (hazard ratio 2.75, p = 0.006).
Revision for aseptic loosening was uncommon for both pre-coated
and non-pre-coated trays (rates of 0.12% and 0%, respectively).
Pre-coating with PMMA does not appear to be protective of revision
for this tibial tray design at short-term follow-up. Cite this article:
