The prevalence of combined abnormalities of femoral torsion (FT) and tibial torsion (TT) is unknown in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and hip dysplasia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of combined abnormalities of FT and TT, and which subgroups are associated with combined abnormalities of FT and TT. We retrospectively evaluated symptomatic patients with FAI or hip dysplasia with CT scans performed between September 2011 and September 2016. A total of 261 hips (174 patients) had a measurement of FT and TT. Their mean age was 31 years (SD 9), and 63% were female (165 hips). Patients were compared to an asymptomatic control group (48 hips, 27 patients) who had CT scans including femur and tibia available for analysis, which had been acquired for nonorthopaedic reasons. Comparisons were conducted using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.Aims
Methods
Abnormal femoral torsion (FT) is increasingly recognized as an additional cause for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). It is unknown if in-toeing of the foot is a specific diagnostic sign for increased FT in patients with symptomatic FAI. The aims of this study were to determine: 1) the prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of in-toeing to detect increased FT; 2) if foot progression angle (FPA) and tibial torsion (TT) are different among patients with abnormal FT; and 3) if FPA correlates with FT. A retrospective, institutional review board (IRB)-approved, controlled study of 85 symptomatic patients (148 hips) with FAI or hip dysplasia was performed in the gait laboratory. All patients had a measurement of FT (pelvic CT scan), TT (CT scan), and FPA (optical motion capture system). We allocated all patients to three groups with decreased FT (< 10°, 37 hips), increased FT (> 25°, 61 hips), and normal FT (10° to 25°, 50 hips). Cluster analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
The number of patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the
hip has increased significantly during the past decade. It has now
become an established technique for the treatment of many intra-
and extra-articular conditions affecting the hip. However, it has
a steep learning curve and is not without the risk of complications.
The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence
of complications during and following this procedure. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
guidelines were used in designing this study. Two reviewers systematically
searched the literature for complications related to arthroscopy
of the hip. The research question and eligibility criteria were
established Aims
Materials and Methods
To confirm whether developmental dysplasia of
the hip has a risk of hip impingement, we analysed maximum ranges
of movement to the point of bony impingement, and impingement location
using three-dimensional (3D) surface models of the pelvis and femur
in combination with 3D morphology of the hip joint using computer-assisted methods.
Results of computed tomography were examined for 52 hip joints with
DDH and 73 normal healthy hip joints. DDH shows larger maximum extension
(p = 0.001) and internal rotation at 90° flexion (p <
0.001).
Similar maximum flexion (p = 0.835) and external rotation (p = 0.713)
were observed between groups, while high rates of extra-articular
impingement were noticed in these directions in DDH (p <
0.001).
Smaller cranial acetabular anteversion (p = 0.048), centre-edge
angles (p <
0.001), a circumferentially shallower acetabulum,
larger femoral neck anteversion (p <
0.001), and larger alpha
angle were identified in DDH. Risk of anterior impingement in retroverted
DDH hips is similar to that in retroverted normal hips in excessive
adduction but minimal in less adduction. These findings might be
borne in mind when considering the possibility of extra-articular
posterior impingement in DDH being a source of pain, particularly
for patients with a highly anteverted femoral neck. Cite this article:
