The direct anterior (DA) approach has been associated with rapid patient recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) but may be associated with more frequent femoral complications including implant loosening. The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of a collar to the femoral stem affects implant migration, patient activity, and patient function following primary THA using the DA approach. Patients were randomized to either a collared (n = 23) or collarless (n = 26) cementless femoral stem implanted using the DA approach. Canal fill ratio (CFR) was measured on the first postoperative radiographs. Patients underwent a supine radiostereometric analysis (RSA) exam postoperatively on the day of surgery and at two, four, six, 12, 26, and 52 weeks postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Mental and Physical Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score) were measured preoperatively and at each post-surgery clinic visit. Activity and function were also measured as the weekly average step count recorded by an activity tracker, and an instrumented timed up-and-go (TUG) test in clinic, respectively.Aims
Methods
Previous studies have reported an increased risk for postoperative complications in the Medicaid population undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). These studies have not controlled for the surgeon’s practice or patient care setting. This study aims to evaluate whether patient point of entry and Medicaid status plays a role in quality outcomes and discharge disposition following THA. The electronic medical record at our institution was retrospectively reviewed for all primary, unilateral THA between January 2016 and January 2018. THA recipients were categorized as either Medicaid or non-Medicaid patients based on a visit to our institution’s Hospital Ambulatory Care Center (HACC) within the six months prior to surgery. Only patients who had been operated on by surgeons (CML, JV, JDS, RS) with at least ten Medicaid and ten non-Medicaid patients were included in the study. The patients included in this study were 56.33% female, had a mean age of 60.85 years, and had a mean BMI of 29.14. The average length of follow-up was 343.73 days.Aims
Methods
Vitamin E-diffused, highly crosslinked polyethylene (VEPE) and porous titanium-coated (PTC) shells were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was: 1) to compare the wear properties of VEPE to moderately crosslinked polyethylene; 2) to assess the stability of PTC shells; and 3) to report their clinical outcomes at seven years. A total of 89 patients were enrolled into a prospective study. All patients received a PTC shell and were randomized to receive a VEPE liner (n = 44) or a moderately crosslinked polyethylene (ModXLPE) liner (n = 45). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used to measure polyethylene wear and component migration. Differences in wear were assessed while adjusting for body mass index, activity level, acetabular inclination, anteversion, and head size. Plain radiographs were assessed for radiolucency and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered at each follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
Whether patient-reported pain differs among surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. This study’s purposes were to determine differences in pain based on surgical approach (direct anterior (DA) This was a retrospective investigation from two centres and seven surgeons (three DA, three PL, one both) of primary THAs. PL patients were categorized for incision length (6 cm to 8 cm, 8 cm to 12 cm, 12 cm to 15 cm). All patients had cementless femoral and acetabular fixation, at least one year’s follow-up, and well-fixed components. Patients completed a pain-drawing questionnaire identifying the location and intensity of pain on an anatomical diagram. Power analysis indicated 800 patients in each cohort for adequate power to detect a 4% difference in pain (alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.80).Aims
Patients and Methods
Compared with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), revision
surgery can be challenging. The cement-in-cement femoral revision
technique involves removing a femoral component from a well-fixed
femoral cement mantle and cementing a new stem into the original
mantle. This technique is widely used and when carried out for the
correct indications, is fast, relatively inexpensive and carries
a reduced short-term risk for the patient compared with the alternative
of removing well-fixed cement. We report the outcomes of this procedure
when two commonly used femoral stems are used. We identified 1179 cement-in-cement stem revisions involving
an Exeter or a Lubinus stem reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty
Register (SHAR) between January 1999 and December 2015. Kaplan-Meier
survival analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
We assessed the difference in hospital based and early clinical
outcomes between the direct anterior approach and the posterior
approach in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA). The outcome was assessed in 448 (203 males, 245 females) consecutive
patients undergoing unilateral primary THA after the implementation
of an ‘Enhanced Recovery’ pathway. In all, 265 patients (mean age:
71 years (49 to 89); 117 males and 148 females) had surgery using
the direct anterior approach (DAA) and 183 patients (mean age: 70
years (26 to 100); 86 males and 97 females) using a posterior approach.
The groups were compared for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists
grade, body mass index, the side of the operation, pre-operative
Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and attendance at ‘Joint school’. Mean follow-up
was 18.1 months (one to 50).Aims
Patients and Methods
Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a potentially
devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty, with historically
high rates of complication and failure because of the technical
challenges of surgery, as well as the prevalence of advanced age
and comorbidity in the patients at risk. This study describes the short-term outcome after revision arthroplasty
using a modular, titanium, tapered, conical stem for PFF in a series
of 38 fractures in 37 patients. The mean age of the cohort was 77 years (47 to 96). A total of
27 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of
at least 3. At a mean follow-up of 35 months (4 to 66) the mean
Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 35 (15 to 48) and comorbidity was significantly
associated with a poorer OHS. All fractures united and no stem needed
to be revised. Three hips in three patients required further surgery
for infection, recurrent PFF and recurrent dislocation and three
other patients required closed manipulation for a single dislocation.
One stem subsided more than 5 mm but then stabilised and required
no further intervention. In this series, a modular, tapered, conical stem provided a versatile
reconstruction solution with a low rate of complications. Cite this article:
The debate whether to use cemented or uncemented
components in primary total hip replacement (THR) has not yet been
considered with reference to the cost implications to the National
Health Service. We obtained the number of cemented and uncemented components
implanted in 2009 from the National Joint Registry for England and
Wales. The cost of each component was established. The initial financial
saving if all were cemented was then calculated. Subsequently the
five-year rates of revision for each type of component were reviewed
and the predicted number of revisions at five years for the actual
components used was compared with the predicted number of revisions
for a cemented THR. This was then multiplied by the mean cost of
revision surgery to provide an indication of the savings over the
first five years if all primary THRs were cemented. The saving at primary THR was calculated to be £10 million with
an additional saving during the first five years of between £5 million
and £8.5 million. The use of cemented components in routine primary
THR in the NHS as a whole can be justified on a financial level
but we recognise individual patient factors must be considered when deciding
which components to use.
The increasing need for total hip replacement
(THR) in an ageing population will inevitably generate a larger number
of revision procedures. The difficulties encountered in dealing
with the bone deficient acetabulum are amongst the greatest challenges
in hip surgery. The failed acetabular component requires reconstruction
to restore the hip centre and improve joint biomechanics. Impaction
bone grafting is successful in achieving acetabular reconstruction
using both cemented and cementless techniques. Bone graft incorporation
restores bone stock whilst providing good component stability. We
provide a summary of the evidence and current literature regarding impaction
bone grafting using both cemented and cementless techniques in revision
THR. Cite this article:
