Brace treatment is the cornerstone of managing developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), yet there is a lack of evidence-based treatment protocols, which results in wide variations in practice. To resolve this, we have developed a comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol conforming to published consensus principles, with well-defined a priori criteria for inclusion and successful treatment. This was a single-centre, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of a consecutive series of infants with ultrasound-confirmed DDH who underwent a comprehensive nonoperative brace management protocol in a unified multidisciplinary clinic between January 2012 and December 2016 with five-year follow-up radiographs. The radiological outcomes were acetabular index-lateral edge (AI-L), acetabular index-sourcil (AI-S), centre-edge angle (CEA), acetabular depth ratio (ADR), International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade, and evidence of avascular necrosis (AVN). At five years, each hip was classified as normal (< 1 SD), borderline dysplastic (1 to 2 SDs), or dysplastic (> 2 SDs) based on validated radiological norm-referenced values.Aims
Methods
A national screening programme has existed in the UK for the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) since 1969. However, every aspect of screening and treatment remains controversial. Screening programmes throughout the world vary enormously, and in the UK there is significant variation in screening practice and treatment pathways. We report the results of an attempt by the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) to identify a nationwide consensus for the management of DDH in order to unify treatment and suggest an approach for screening. A Delphi consensus study was performed among the membership of BSCOS. Statements were generated by a steering group regarding aspects of the management of DDH in children aged under three months, namely screening and surveillance (15 questions), the technique of ultrasound scanning (eight questions), the initiation of treatment (19 questions), care during treatment with a splint (ten questions), and on quality, governance, and research (eight questions). A two-round Delphi process was used and a consensus document was produced at the final meeting of the steering group.Aims
Methods
Radiological residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) has been reported in up to 30% of children who had successful brace treatment of infant developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Predicting those who will resolve and those who may need corrective surgery is important to optimize follow-up protocols. In this study we have aimed to identify the prevalence and predictors of RAD at two years and five years post-bracing. This was a single-centre, prospective longitudinal cohort study of infants with DDH managed using a published, standardized Pavlik harness protocol between January 2012 and December 2016. RAD was measured at two years’ mean follow-up using acetabular index-lateral edge (AI-L) and acetabular index-sourcil (AI-S), and at five years using AI-L, AI-S, centre-edge angle (CEA), and acetabular depth ratio (ADR). Each hip was classified based on published normative values for normal, borderline (1 to 2 standard deviations (SDs)), or dysplastic (> 2 SDs) based on sex, age, and laterality.Aims
Methods
There is no consensus regarding optimum timing and frequency of ultrasound (US) for monitoring response to Pavlik harness (PH) treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of our study was to determine if a limited-frequency hip US assessment had an adverse effect on treatment outcomes compared to traditional comprehensive US monitoring. This study was a single-centre noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Infants aged under six months whose hips were reduced and centred in the harness at initiation of treatment (stable dysplastic or subluxable), or initially decentred (subluxated or dislocated) but reduced and centred within four weeks of PH treatment, were randomized to our current standard US monitoring protocol (every clinic visit) or to a limited-frequency US protocol (US only at end of treatment). Groups were compared based on α angle and femoral head coverage at the end of PH treatment, acetabular indices, and International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade on one-year follow-up radiographs.Aims
Methods
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) should
be diagnosed as early as possible to optimise treatment. The current
United Kingdom recommendations for the selective screening of DDH
include a clinical examination at birth and at six weeks. In Northern
Ireland babies continue to have an assessment by a health visitor
at four months of age. As we continue to see late presentations
of DDH, beyond one year of age, we hypothesised that a proportion had
missed an opportunity for earlier diagnosis. We expect those who
presented to our service with Tonnis grade III or IV hips and decreased
abduction would have had clinical signs at their earlier assessments. We performed a retrospective review of all patients born in Northern
Ireland between 2008 and 2010 who were diagnosed with DDH after
their first birthday. There were 75 856 live births during the study
period of whom 645 children were treated for DDH (8.5 per 1000).
The minimum follow-up of our cohort from birth, to detect late presentation,
was four years and six months. Of these, 32 children (33 hips) were
diagnosed after their first birthday (0.42 per 1000). With optimum application of our selective screening programme
21 (65.6%) of these children had the potential for an earlier diagnosis,
which would have reduced the incidence of late diagnosis to 0.14
per 1000. As we saw a peak in diagnosis between three and five months
our findings support the continuation of the four month health visitor
check. Our study adds further information to the debate regarding
selective Cite this article:
Pelvic obliquity is a common finding in adolescents
with cerebral palsy, however, there is little agreement on its measurement
or relationship with hip development at different gross motor function
classification system (GMFCS) levels. The purpose of this investigation was to study these issues in
a large, population-based cohort of adolescents with cerebral palsy
at transition into adult services. The cohort were a subset of a three year birth cohort (n = 98,
65M: 33F, with a mean age of 18.8 years (14.8 to 23.63) at their
last radiological review) with the common features of a migration
percentage greater than 30% and a history of adductor release surgery. Different radiological methods of measuring pelvic obliquity
were investigated in 40 patients and the angle between the acetabular
tear drops (ITDL) and the horizontal reference frame of the radiograph
was found to be reliable, with good face validity. This was selected
for further study in all 98 patients. The median pelvic obliquity was 4° (interquartile range 2° to
8°). There was a strong correlation between hip morphology and the
presence of pelvic obliquity (effect of ITDL on Sharpe’s angle in
the higher hip; rho 7.20 (5% confidence interval 5.59 to 8.81, p
<
0.001). This was particularly true in non-ambulant adolescents
(GMFCS IV and V) with severe pelvic obliquity, but was also easily
detectable and clinically relevant in ambulant adolescents with mild
pelvic obliquity. The identification of pelvic obliquity and its management deserves
closer scrutiny in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Cite this article: