The aim of this study was to compare the rate of mortality and
causes of death in Korean patients who undergo surgery for a fracture
of the hip, up to 11 years after the injury, with a control group
from the general population. National cohort data from Korean Health Insurance Review and
Assessment Service – National Sample Cohort were used. A ratio of
1:4 matched patients with a fracture who underwent surgery (3383,
fracture group) between 2003 and 2012, and controls (13 532) were
included. The matches were processed for age, gender, income, and
region of residence. We also undertook analyses of subgroups according
to age and gender. The mean follow-up was 4.45 years (1 to 11).Aims
Materials and Methods
Aims
Patients and Methods
We performed a case–control study to compare
the rates of further surgery, revision and complications, operating time
and survival in patients who were treated with either an uncemented
hydroxyapatite-coated Corail bipolar femoral stem or a cemented
Exeter stem for a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip. The
mean age of the patients in the uncemented group was 82.5 years
(53 to 97) and in the cemented group was 82.7 years (51 to 99) We used
propensity score matching, adjusting for age, gender and the presence
or absence of dementia and comorbidities, to produce a matched cohort
receiving an Exeter stem (n = 69) with which to compare the outcome of
patients receiving a Corail stem (n = 69). The Corail had a significantly
lower all-cause rate of further surgery (p = 0.016; odds ratio (OR)
0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.84) and number of hips undergoing major further
surgery (p = 0.029; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.09). The mean operating
time was significantly less for the Corail group than for the cemented Exeter
group (59 min [12 to 136] Cite this article:
The outcome after total hip replacement has improved
with the development of surgical techniques, better pain management
and the introduction of enhanced recovery pathways. These pathways
require a multidisciplinary team to manage pre-operative education,
multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation. The current economic
climate and restricted budgets favour brief hospitalisation while
minimising costs. This has put considerable pressure on hospitals
to combine excellent results, early functional recovery and shorter
admissions. In this review we present an evidence-based summary of some common
interventions and methods, including pre-operative patient education,
pre-emptive analgesia, local infiltration analgesia, pre-operative
nutrition, the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields, peri-operative
rehabilitation, wound dressings, different surgical techniques, minimally
invasive surgery and fast-track joint replacement units. Cite this article:
