The poor reporting and use of statistical methods in orthopaedic papers has been widely discussed by both clinicians and statisticians. A detailed review of research published in general orthopaedic journals was undertaken to assess the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting. A representative sample of 100 papers was assessed for compliance to CONSORT and STROBE guidelines and the quality of the statistical reporting was assessed using a validated questionnaire. Overall compliance with CONSORT and STROBE guidelines in our study was 59% and 58% respectively, with very few papers fulfilling all criteria. In 37% of papers patient numbers were inadequately reported; 20% of papers introduced new statistical methods in the ‘results’ section not previously reported in the ‘methods’ section, and 23% of papers reported no measurement of error with the main outcome measure. Taken together, these issues indicate a general lack of statistical rigour and are consistent with similar reviews undertaken in a number of other scientific and clinical research disciplines. It is imperative that the orthopaedic research community strives to improve the quality of reporting; a failure to do so could seriously limit the development of future research.
Implant-associated infection is a major source
of morbidity in orthopaedic surgery. There has been extensive research
into the development of materials that prevent biofilm formation,
and hence, reduce the risk of infection. Silver nanoparticle technology
is receiving much interest in the field of orthopaedics for its
antimicrobial properties, and the results of studies to date are
encouraging. Antimicrobial effects have been seen when silver nanoparticles are
used in trauma implants, tumour prostheses, bone cement, and also
when combined with hydroxyapatite coatings. Although there are promising
results with Cite this article:
Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management
of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce
serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either
alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are
not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently
issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states
must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication. In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative
focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives
in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating
Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation
of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted
the importance of informing and educating clinicians. Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications
in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical
care. Cite this article:
This paper offers a summary of the ethical guide
for the European orthopaedic community; the full report will be
published in the EFORT Journal. Cite this article:
We evaluated the quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis
in orthopaedic surgery by examining how they adhere to validated
methodological standards in their development. A structured review
was performed for guidelines that were published between January
2005 and April 2013 in medical journals or on the Internet. A pre-defined
computerised search was used in MEDLINE, Scopus and Google to identify
the guidelines. The AGREE II assessment tool was used to evaluate
the quality of the guidelines in the study. Seven international and national guidelines were identified.
The overall methodological quality of the individual guidelines
was good. ‘Scope and Purpose’ (median score 98% interquartile range
(IQR)) 86% to 98%) and ‘Clarity of Presentation’ (median score 90%,
IQR 90% to 95%) were the two domains that received the highest scores. ‘Applicability’
(median score 68%, IQR 45% to 75%) and ‘Editorial Independence’
(median score 71%, IQR 68% to 75%) had the lowest scores. These findings reveal that although the overall methodological
quality of guidelines on thromboprophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery
is good, domains within their development, such as ‘Applicability’
and ‘Editorial Independence’, need to be improved. Application of
the AGREE II instrument by the authors of guidelines may improve
the quality of future guidelines and provide increased focus on
aspects of methodology used in their development that are not robust. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:19–23.
Ten patients, who were unsuitable for limb lengthening over an intramedullary nail, underwent lengthening with a submuscular locking plate. Their mean age at operation was 18.5 years (11 to 40). After fixing a locking plate submuscularly on the proximal segment, an external fixator was applied to lengthen the bone after corticotomy. Lengthening was at 1 mm/day and on reaching the target length, three or four screws were placed in the plate in the distal segment and the external fixator was removed. All patients achieved the pre-operative target length at a mean of 4.0 cm (3.2 to 5.5). The mean duration of external fixation was 61.6 days (45 to 113) and the mean external fixation index was 15.1 days/cm (13.2 to 20.5), which was less than one-third of the mean healing index (48 days/cm (41.3 to 55). There were only minor complications. Lengthening with a submuscular locking plate can successfully permit early removal of the fixator with fewer complications and is a useful alternative in children or when nailing is difficult.
