Antifibrinolytic agents, including tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), have been shown to be safe and effective for decreasing perioperative blood loss and transfusion following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are few prospective studies that directly compare these agents. The purpose of this study was to compare the benefits of intraoperative intravenous TXA with EACA. A total of 235 patients (90 THA and 145 TKA) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial at a single tertiary-care referral centre. In the THA cohort, 53.3% of the patients were female with a median age of 59.8 years (interquartile range (IQR) 53.3 to 68.1). In the TKA cohort, 63.4% of the patients were female with a median age of 65.1 years (IQR 59.4 to 69.5). Patients received either TXA (n = 119) or EACA (n = 116) in two doses intraoperatively. The primary outcome measures included change in haemoglobin level and blood volume, postoperative drainage, and rate of transfusion. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative complications, cost, and length of stay (LOS).Aims
Patients and Methods
Tranexamic acid is a fibrinolytic inhibitor which reduces blood loss in total knee replacement. We examined the effect on blood loss of a standardised intravenous bolus dose of 1 g of tranexamic acid, given at the induction of anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement and tested the potential prothrombotic effect by undertaking routine venography. In all, 36 patients received 1 g of tranexamic acid, and 37 no tranexamic acid. Blood loss was measured directly per-operatively and indirectly post-operatively. Tranexamic acid reduced the early post-operative blood loss and total blood loss (p = 0.03 and p = 0.008, respectively) but not the intraoperative blood loss. The tranexamic acid group required fewer transfusions (p = 0.03) and had no increased incidence of deep-vein thrombosis. The reduction in early post-operative blood loss was more marked in women (p = 0.05), in whom this effect was dose-related (r = −0.793). Our study showed that the administration of a standardised pre-operative bolus of 1 g of tranexamic acid was cost-effective in reducing the blood loss and transfusion requirements after total hip replacement, especially in women.
In our department we use an enhanced recovery
protocol for joint replacement of the lower limb. This incorporates the
use of intravenous tranexamic acid (IVTA; 15 mg/kg) at the induction
of anaesthesia. Recently there was a national shortage of IVTA for
18 weeks; during this period all patients received an oral preparation
of tranexamic acid (OTA; 25 mg/kg). This retrospective study compares
the safety (surgical and medical complications) and efficacy (reduction
of transfusion requirements) of OTA and IVTA. During the study period
a total of 2698 patients received IVTA and 302 received OTA. After
adjusting for a range of patient and surgical factors, the odds
ratio (OR) of receiving a blood transfusion was significantly higher
with IVTA than with OTA (OR 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.26 to
0.89), p = 0.019), whereas the safety profile was similar, based
on length of stay, rate of readmission, return to theatre, deep
infection, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, myocardial infarction,
pneumonia, deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The financial
benefit of OTA is £2.04 for a 70 kg patient; this is amplified when
the cost saving associated with significantly fewer blood transfusions
is considered. Although the number of patients in the study is modest, this
work supports the use of OTA, and we recommend that a randomised
trial be undertaken to compare the different methods of administering
tranexamic acid. Cite this article:
