The surgical management of ankle arthritis with tibiotalar arthrodesis
is known to alter gait, as compared with normal ankles. The purpose
of this study was to assess post-operative gait function with gait
before arthrodesis. We prospectively studied 20 patients who underwent three-dimensional
gait analysis before and after tibiotalar arthrodesis. Cadence,
step length, walking velocity and total support time were assessed.
Kinetic parameters, including the moment and power of the ankle
in the sagittal plane and hip power were also recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis
of modern total ankle replacements (TARs) to determine the survivorship,
outcome, complications, radiological findings and range of movement,
in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle who
undergo this procedure. We used the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration,
which uses risk of bias profiling to assess the quality of papers
in favour of a domain-based approach. Continuous outcome scores
were pooled across studies using the generic inverse variance method
and the random-effects model was used to incorporate clinical and
methodological heterogeneity. We included 58 papers (7942 TARs)
with an interobserver reliability (Kappa) for selection, performance,
attrition, detection and reporting bias of between 0.83 and 0.98.
The overall survivorship was 89% at ten years with an annual failure
rate of 1.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7 to 1.6). The mean
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score changed from 40 (95%
CI 36 to 43) pre-operatively to 80 (95% CI 76 to 84) at a mean follow-up
of 8.2 years (7 to 10) (p <
0.01). Radiolucencies were identified
in up to 23% of TARs after a mean of 4.4 years (2.3 to 9.6). The
mean total range of movement improved from 23° (95% CI 19 to 26)
to 34° (95% CI 26 to 41) (p = 0.01). Our study demonstrates that TAR has a positive impact on patients’
lives, with benefits lasting ten years, as judged by improvement
in pain and function, as well as improved gait and increased range
of movement. However, the quality of evidence is weak and fraught
with biases and high quality randomised controlled trials are required
to compare TAR with other forms of treatment such as fusion. Cite this article:
