We describe the application of a non-invasive extendible endoprosthetic replacement in skeletally-mature patients undergoing revision for failed joint replacement with resultant limb-length inequality after malignant or non-malignant disease. This prosthesis was developed for tumour surgery in skeletally-immature patients but has now been adapted for use in revision procedures to reconstruct the joint or facilitate an arthrodesis, replace bony defects and allow limb length to be restored gradually in the post-operative period. We record the short-term results in nine patients who have had this procedure after multiple previous reconstructive operations. In six, the initial reconstruction had been performed with either allograft or endoprosthetic replacement for neoplastic disease and in three for non-neoplastic disease. The essential components of the prosthesis are a magnetic disc, a gearbox and a drive screw which allows painless lengthening of the prosthesis using the principle of electromagnetic induction. The mean age of the patients was 37 years (18 to 68) with a mean follow-up of 34 months (12 to 62). They had previously undergone a mean of six (2 to 14) open procedures on the affected limb before revision with the non-invasive extendible endoprosthesis. The mean length gained was 56 mm (19 to 107) requiring a mean of nine (3 to 20) lengthening episodes performed in the outpatient department. There was one case of recurrent infection after revision of a previously infected implant and one fracture of the prosthesis after a fall. No amputations were performed. Planned exchange of the prosthesis was required in three patients after attainment of the maximum lengthening capacity of the implant. There was no failure of the lengthening mechanism. The Mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating score was 22 of 30 available points (18 to 28). The use of a non-invasive extendible endoprosthesis in this manner provided patients with good functional results and restoration of leg-length equality, without the need for multiple open lengthening procedures

We report a prospective randomly controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of continuous passive motion (CPM) in improving postoperative function and range of movement after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We allocated 53 patients (57 knees) to one of three postoperative regimes: no CPM (n = 19); CPM at 0 to 40° (0 to 40 CPM; n = 18); and CPM at 0 to 70° (0 to 70 CPM; n = 20). Those in the CPM groups had CPM for 48 hours and all patients had an identical regime of physiotherapy. There was an even distribution of various cemented and cementless TKAs in each group. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at one week and at one year postoperatively. At one week, there was a statistically significant increase in the range of flexion and total range of movement in the 0 to 70 CPM group compared with the no-CPM group. At one year we found no significant differences in mean flexion, overall range of movement, fixed flexion deformity or functional results in the three groups. Those who had CPM had a significant increase in analgesic requirement (p = 0.04). There was an increased mean blood drainage postoperatively in those who had 0 to 70 CPM (1558 ml) compared with those with no CPM (956 ml) (t = 2.96, p = 0.005) and with 0 to 40 CPM (1017 ml) (t = 2.62, p = 0.01). Our findings show that CPM had no significant advantage in terms of improving function or range of movement, and that its use increased blood loss and analgesic requirements