The results of surgery for Dupuytren’s disease can be compromised by the potential for disease recurrence and loss of function. Selecting which patients will benefit from repeat surgery, when to operate, and what procedure to undertake requires judgement and an understanding of patient expectations and functional needs. We undertook this study to investigate patient outcomes and satisfaction following repeat limited fasciectomy for recurrent Dupuytren’s disease. We prospectively identified all patients presenting with recurrence of Dupuytren’s disease who were selected for surgical treatment with repeat limited fasciectomy surgery between January 2013 and February 2015. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and again at a minimum of five years postoperatively. We identified 43 patients who were carefully selected for repeat fasciectomy involving 54 fingers. Patients with severe or aggressive disease with extensive skin involvement were not included; in our practice, these patients are instead counselled and preferentially treated with dermofasciectomy. The primary outcome measured was change in the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) score. Secondary outcomes were change in finger range of motion, flexion contracture, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) values, and overall satisfaction.Aims
Methods
This article is a systematic review of the published
literature about the biomechanics, functional outcome and complications
of intramedullary nailing of fractures of the distal radius. We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases and included all
studies which reported the outcome of intramedullary (IM) nailing
of fractures of the distal radius. Data about functional outcome,
range of movement (ROM), strength and complications, were extracted.
The studies included were appraised independently by both authors
using a validated quality assessment scale for non-controlled studies
and the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The search strategy revealed 785 studies, of which 16 were included
for full paper review. These included three biomechanical studies,
eight case series and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The biomechanical studies concluded that IM nails were at least
as strong as locking plates. The clinical studies reported that
IM nailing gave a comparable ROM, functional outcome and grip strength
to other fixation techniques. However, the mean complication rate of intramedullary nailing
was 17.6% (0% to 50%). This is higher than the rates reported in
contemporary studies for volar plating. It raises concerns about
the role of intramedullary nailing, particularly when comparative
studies have failed to show that it has any major advantage over
other techniques. Further adequately powered RCTs comparing the
technique to both volar plating and percutaneous wire fixation are needed. Cite this article:
