Most patients (95%) with fibular hemimelia have
an absent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The purpose of this study
was to assess the long-term outcome of such patients with respect
to pain and knee
We investigated the extent to which improved
balance relative to pain relief correlates with the success of total knee
replacement (TKR). A total of 81 patients were recruited to the
study: 16 men (19.8%) and 65 women (80.2%). Of these, 62 patients
(10 men, 52 women) with a mean age of 73 (57 to 83) underwent static
and dynamic assessment of balance pre-operatively and one year post-operatively.
The parameters of balance were quantified using commercially available
and validated equipment. Motor
The aim of this study was to determine the association
between the Oxford knee score (OKS) and direct assessment of outcome,
and to examine how this relationship varied at different time-points
following total knee replacement (TKR). Prospective data consisting
of the OKS, numerical rating scales for ‘worst pain’ and ‘perceived
mean daily pain’, timed functional assessments (chair rising, stairs
and walking ability), goniometry and lower limb power were recorded
for 183 patients pre-operatively and at six, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively.
The OKS was influenced primarily by the patient’s level of pain
rather than objective functional assessments. The relationship between report
of outcome and direct assessment changed over time: R2 =
35% pre-operatively, 44% at six weeks, 57% at 26 weeks and 62% at
52 weeks. The relationship between assessment of performance and report
of performance improved as the patient’s report of pain diminished,
suggesting that patients’ reporting of functional outcome after
TKR is influenced more by their pain level than their ability to
accomplish tasks.
Aims. The aim was to assess whether robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had greater knee-specific outcomes, improved fulfilment of expectations, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared with manual TKA (mTKA). Methods. A randomized controlled trial was undertaken (May 2019 to December 2021), and patients were allocated to either mTKA or rTKA. A total of 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 43 rTKA and 38 mTKA patients were available for review at 12 months following surgery. There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the groups. The minimal clinically important difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score was defined as 7.5 points. Results. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the knee-specific measures (WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)) or HRQoL measures (EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)) at 12 months between the groups. However, the rTKA group had significantly (p = 0.029) greater improvements in the WOMAC pain component (mean difference 9.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 18.4) over the postoperative period (two, six, and 12 months), which was clinically meaningful. This was not observed for
Aims. There are comparatively few randomized studies evaluating knee arthroplasty prostheses, and fewer still that report longer-term functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcomes of an existing implant trial cohort to document changing patient
Aims. Our aim was to compare kinematic with mechanical alignment in
total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods. We performed a prospective blinded randomised controlled trial
to compare the functional outcome of patients undergoing TKA in
mechanical alignment (MA) with those in kinematic alignment (KA).
A total of 71 patients undergoing TKA were randomised to either
kinematic (n = 36) or mechanical alignment (n = 35). Pre- and post-operative
hip-knee-ankle radiographs were analysed. The knee injury and osteoarthritis
outcome score (KOOS), American Knee Society Score, Short Form-36,
Euro-Qol (EQ-5D), range of movement (ROM), two minute walk, and timed
up and go tests were assessed pre-operatively and at six weeks,
three and six months and one year post-operatively. Results. A total of 78% of the kinematically aligned group (28 patients)
and 77% of the mechanically aligned group (27 patients) were within
3° of their pre-operative plan. There were no statistically significant
differences in the mean KOOS (difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval
(CI) -9.4 to 12.1, p = 0.80), EQ-5D (difference 0.8, 95% CI -7.9
to 9.6, p = 0.84), ROM (difference 0.1, 95% CI -6.0 to 6.1, p =
0.99), two minute distance tolerance (difference 20.0, 95% CI -52.8 to
92.8, p = 0.58), or timed up and go (difference 0.78, 95% CI -2.3
to 3.9, p = 0.62) between the groups at one year. Conclusion. Kinematically aligned TKAs appear to have comparable short-term
results to mechanically aligned TKAs with no significant differences
in
This study validates the short-form WOMAC
We performed a randomised controlled trial comparing
computer-assisted surgery (CAS) with conventional surgery (CONV)
in total knee replacement (TKR). Between 2009 and 2011 a total of
192 patients with a mean age of 68 years (55 to 85) with osteoarthritis
or arthritic disease of the knee were recruited from four Norwegian
hospitals. At three months follow-up, functional results were marginally
better for the CAS group. Mean differences (MD) in favour of CAS
were found for the Knee Society
We assessed the functional outcome following fracture of the tibial plateau in 63 consecutive patients. Fifty-one patients were treated by internal fixation, five by combined internal and external fixation and seven non-operatively. Measurements of joint movement and muscle
The amount of anteroposterior laxity required for a good range of movement and knee
The use of a valgus brace can effectively relieve the symptoms of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. This study provides an objective measurement of
We sought to determine the degree of correlation between the condition of the patellar articular cartilage and patellofemoral symptoms and
We assessed the effect of mental disability on
the outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) and investigated whether
mental health improves post-operatively. Outcome data were prospectively
recorded over a three-year period for 962 patients undergoing primary
TKR for osteoarthritis. Pre-operative and one year Short-Form (SF)-12 scores
and Oxford knee scores (OKS) were obtained. The mental component
of the SF-12 was stratified into four groups according to level
of mental disability (none ≥ 50, mild 40 to 49, moderate 30 to 39,
severe <
30). Patients with any degree of mental disability had
a significantly greater subjective physical disability according
to the SF-12 (p = 0.06) and OKS (p <
0.001). The improvement
in the disease-specific score (OKS) was not affected by a patient’s
mental health (p = 0.33). In contrast, patients with mental disability
had less of an improvement in their global physical health (SF-12)
(p <
0.001). However, patients with any degree of mental disability
had a significant improvement in their mental health post-operatively
(p <
0.001). Despite a similar improvement in their disease-specific scores
and improvement in their mental health, patients with mental disability
were significantly more likely to be dissatisfied with their TKR
at one year (p = 0.001). Patients with poor mental health do benefit
from improvements in their mental health and knee
Using meta-analysis we compared the survival and clinical outcomes of cemented and uncemented techniques in primary total knee replacement. We reviewed randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing cemented and uncemented fixation. Our primary outcome was survival of the implant free of aseptic loosening. Our secondary outcome was joint
A postal questionnaire was sent to 10 000 patients more than one year after their total knee replacement (TKR). They were assessed using the Oxford knee score and were asked whether they were satisfied, unsure or unsatisfied with their TKR. The response rate was 87.4% (8231 of 9417 eligible questionnaires) and a total of 81.8% (6625 of 8095) of patients were satisfied. Multivariable regression modelling showed that patients with higher scores relating to the pain and
The aim of this study was to determine whether closed suction drain (CSD) use influences recovery of quadriceps strength and to examine the effects of drain use on secondary outcomes: quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion, bioelectrical measure of swelling, range of movement (ROM), pain, and wound healing complications. A total of 29 patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized blinded study. Patients were randomized to receive a CSD in one limb while the contralateral limb had the use of a subcutaneous drain (SCDRN) without the use of suction (‘sham drain’). Isometric quadriceps strength was collected as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes consisted of quadriceps activation, intra-articular effusion measured via ultrasound, lower limb swelling measured with bioelectrical impendence and limb girth, knee ROM, and pain. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at day two, two and six weeks, and three months. Differences between limbs were determined using paired Student’s Aims
Patients and Methods
Accurate, reproducible outcome measures are essential
for the evaluation of any orthopaedic procedure, in both clinical
practice and research. Commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have
drawbacks such as ‘floor’ and ‘ceiling’ effects, limitations of
worldwide adaptability and an inability to distinguish pain from
function. They are also unable to measure the true outcome of an
intervention rather than a patient’s perception of that outcome. Performance-based functional outcome tools may address these
problems. It is important that both clinicians and researchers are
aware of these measures when dealing with high-demand patients,
using a new intervention or implant, or testing a new rehabilitation
protocol. This article provides an overview of some of the clinically-validated
performance-based functional outcome tools used in the assessment
of patients undergoing hip and knee surgery. Cite this article:
The role of computer-assisted surgery in maintaining the level of the joint in primary knee joint replacement (TKR) has not been well defined. We undertook a blinded randomised controlled trial comparing joint-line maintenance, functional outcomes, and quality-of-life outcomes between patients undergoing computer-assisted and conventional TKR. A total of 115 patients were randomised (computer-assisted, n = 55; conventional, n = 60). Two years post-operatively no significant correlation was found between computer-assisted and conventional surgery in terms of maintaining the joint line. Those TKRs where the joint line was depressed post-operatively improved the least in terms of functional scores. No difference was detected in terms of quality-of-life outcomes. Change in joint line was found to be related to change in alignment. Change in alignment significantly affects change in joint line and functional scores.
The aim of this study was to analyse the gait
pattern, muscle force and functional outcome of patients who had undergone
replacement of the proximal tibia for tumour and alloplastic reconstruction
of the extensor mechanism using the patellar-loop technique. Between February 1998 and December 2009, we carried out wide
local excision of a primary sarcoma of the proximal tibia, proximal
tibial replacement and reconstruction of the extensor mechanism
using the patellar-loop technique in 18 patients. Of these, nine
were available for evaluation after a mean of 11.6 years (0.5 to
21.6). The strength of the knee extensors was measured using an
Isobex machine and gait analysis was undertaken in our gait assessment
laboratory. Functional outcome was assessed using the American Knee
Society (AKS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores. The gait pattern of the patients differed in ground contact time,
flexion heel strike, maximal flexion loading response and total
sagittal plane excursion. The mean maximum active flexion was 91°
(30° to 110°). The overall mean extensor lag was 1° (0° to 5°).
The mean extensor muscle strength was 25.8% (8.3% to 90.3%) of that
in the non-operated leg (p <
0.001). The mean functional scores
were 68.7% (43.4% to 83.3%) (MSTS) and 71.1 (30 to 90) (AKS functional
score). In summary, the results show that reconstruction of the extensor
mechanism using this technique gives good biomechanical and functional
results. The patients’ gait pattern is close to normal, except for
a somewhat stiff knee gait pattern. The strength of the extensor
mechanism is reduced, but sufficient for walking. Cite this article:
Aims. The primary aim was to assess whether robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) had a greater early knee-specific outcome when compared to manual TKA (mTKA). Secondary aims were to assess whether rTKA was associated with improved expectation fulfilment, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction when compared to mTKA. Methods. A randomized controlled trial was undertaken, and patients were randomized to either mTKA or rTKA. The primary objective was functional improvement at six months. Overall, 100 patients were randomized, 50 to each group, of whom 46 rTKA and 41 mTKA patients were available for review at six months following surgery. There were no differences between the two groups. Results. There was no difference between rTKA and mTKA groups at six months according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) functional score (mean difference (MD) 3.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.6 to 13.1); p = 0.425). There was a greater improvement in the WOMAC pain score at two months (MD 9.5 (95% CI 0.6 to 18.3); p = 0.037) in the rTKA group, although by six months no significant difference was observed (MD 6.7 (95% CI -3.6 to 17.1); p = 0.198). The rTKA group were more likely to achieve a minimal important change in their WOMAC pain score when compared to the mTKA group at two months (n = 36 (78.3%) vs n = 24 (58.5%); p = 0.047) and at six months (n = 40 (87.0%) vs n = 29 (68.3%); p = 0.036). There was no difference in satisfaction between the rTKA group (97.8%; n = 45/46) and the mTKA group (87.8%; n = 36/41) at six months (p = 0.096). There were no differences in EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) utility gain (p ≥ 0.389) or fulfilment of patient expectation (p ≥ 0.054) between the groups. Conclusion. There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in the change in WOMAC