It is unclear if a supportive bandage, removable splint, or walking cast offers the best outcome following low-risk ankle fractures in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial to compare these treatments. Children aged five to 15 years with low-risk ankle fractures were recruited to this feasibility trial from 1 February 2020 to 30 March 2023. Children were randomized to supportive bandage, removable splint, or walking cast for two weeks. Follow-up at two, six, and 12 weeks was undertaken to determine feasibility for a definitive trial. Outcomes collected included complications, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mobility score, Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory, youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire, and Activities Scale for Kids - Performance.Aims
Methods
We present the validation of a translation into
Danish of the Oxford ankle foot questionnaire (OxAFQ). We followed the
Isis Pros guidelines for translation and pilot-tested the questionnaire
on ten children and their parents. Following modifications we tested
the validity of the final questionnaire on 82 children (36 boys
and 45 girls) with a mean age of 11.7 years (5.5 to 16.0) and their
parents. We tested the reliability (repeatability (test–retest),
child–parent agreement, internal consistency), feasibility (response
rate, time to completion, floor and ceiling effects) and construct
validity. The generic child health questionnaire was used for comparison.
We found good internal consistency for the physical and the school
and play domains, but lower internal consistency for the emotional domain.
Overall, good repeatability was found within children and parents
as well as agreement between children and parents. The OxAFQ was
fast and easy to complete, but we observed a tendency towards ceiling
effects in the school and play and emotional domains. To our knowledge
this is the first independent validation of the OxAFQ in any language.
We found it valid and feasible for use in the clinic to assess the
impact on children’s lives of foot and/or ankle disorders. It is
a valuable research tool. Cite this article:
