Currently, there is no animal model in which
to evaluate the underlying physiological processes leading to the heterotopic
ossification (HO) which forms in most combat-related and blast wounds.
We sought to reproduce the ossification that forms under these circumstances
in a rat by emulating patterns of injury seen in patients with severe
injuries resulting from blasts. We investigated whether exposure
to blast overpressure increased the prevalence of HO after transfemoral
amputation performed within the zone of injury. We exposed rats
to a blast overpressure alone (BOP-CTL), crush injury and femoral
fracture followed by amputation through the zone of injury (AMP-CTL)
or a combination of these (BOP-AMP). The presence of HO was evaluated
using radiographs, micro-CT and histology. HO developed in none
of nine BOP-CTL, six of nine AMP-CTL, and in all 20 BOP-AMP rats.
Exposure to blast overpressure increased the prevalence of HO. This model may thus be used to elucidate cellular and molecular
pathways of HO, the effect of varying intensities of blast overpressure,
and to evaluate new means of prophylaxis and treatment of heterotopic
ossification. Cite this article:
Nanotechnology is the study, production and controlled
manipulation of materials with a grain size <
100 nm. At this
level, the laws of classical mechanics fall away and those of quantum
mechanics take over, resulting in unique behaviour of matter in
terms of melting point, conductivity and reactivity. Additionally,
and likely more significant, as grain size decreases, the ratio
of surface area to volume drastically increases, allowing for greater interaction
between implants and the surrounding cellular environment. This
favourable increase in surface area plays an important role in mesenchymal
cell differentiation and ultimately bone–implant interactions. Basic science and translational research have revealed important
potential applications for nanotechnology in orthopaedic surgery,
particularly with regard to improving the interaction between implants
and host bone. Nanophase materials more closely match the architecture
of native trabecular bone, thereby greatly improving the osseo-integration
of orthopaedic implants. Nanophase-coated prostheses can also reduce
bacterial adhesion more than conventionally surfaced prostheses.
Nanophase selenium has shown great promise when used for tumour
reconstructions, as has nanophase silver in the management of traumatic
wounds. Nanophase silver may significantly improve healing of peripheral
nerve injuries, and nanophase gold has powerful anti-inflammatory
effects on tendon inflammation. Considerable advances must be made in our understanding of the
potential health risks of production, implantation and wear patterns
of nanophase devices before they are approved for clinical use.
Their potential, however, is considerable, and is likely to benefit
us all in the future. Cite this article:
