Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) versus hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented HA for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. Methods. A within-trial
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual-mobility components (DM-THA) has been shown to decrease the risk of dislocation in the setting of a displaced neck of femur fracture compared to conventional single-bearing THA (SB-THA). This study assesses if the clinical benefit of a reduced dislocation rate can justify the incremental cost increase of DM-THA compared to SB-THA. Costs and benefits were established for patients aged 75 to 79 years over a five-year time period in the base case from the Canadian Health Payer’s perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the base case model conclusions.Aims
Methods
The rate of dislocation when traditional single bearing implants are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be between 8% and 10%. The use of dual mobility bearings can reduce this risk to between 0.5% and 2%. Dual mobility bearings are more expensive, and it is not clear if the additional clinical benefits constitute value for money for the payers. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dual mobility compared with single bearings for patients undergoing revision THA. We developed a Markov model to estimate the expected cost and benefits of dual mobility compared with single bearing implants in patients undergoing revision THA. The rates of revision and further revision were calculated from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, while rates of transition from one health state to another were estimated from the literature, and the data were stratified by sex and age. Implant and healthcare costs were estimated from local procurement prices and national tariffs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published utility estimates for patients undergoing THA.Aims
Methods
There is little evidence on the cost effectiveness
of different brands of hip prostheses. We compared lifetime cost effectiveness
of frequently used brands within types of prosthesis including cemented
(Exeter V40 Contemporary, Exeter V40 Duration and Exeter V40 Elite
Plus Ogee), cementless (Corail Pinnacle, Accolade Trident, and Taperloc Exceed)
and hybrid (Exeter V40 Trilogy, Exeter V40 Trident, and CPT Trilogy).
We used data from three linked English national databases to estimate
the lifetime risk of revision, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
and cost. For women with osteoarthritis aged 70 years, the Exeter V40 Elite
Plus Ogee had the lowest risk of revision (5.9% revision risk, 9.0
QALYs) and the CPT Trilogy had the highest QALYs (10.9% revision
risk, 9.3 QALYs). Compared with the Corail Pinnacle (9.3% revision
risk, 9.22 QALYs), the most commonly used brand, and assuming a
willingness-to-pay of £20 000 per QALY gain, the CPT Trilogy is
most cost effective, with an incremental net monetary benefit of £876.
Differences in cost effectiveness between the hybrid CPT Trilogy
and Exeter V40 Trident and the cementless Corail Pinnacle and Taperloc
Exceed were small, and a cautious interpretation is required, given
the limitations of the available information. However, it is unlikely that cemented brands are among the most
cost effective. Similar patterns of results were observed for men
and other ages. The gain in quality of life after total hip arthroplasty,
rather than the risk of revision, was the main driver of cost effectiveness. Cite this article:
