Recent guidance recommends the use of a well-proven
cemented femoral stem for hemiarthroplasty in the management of
fractures of the femoral neck, and the Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS)
has been suggested as an example of such an implant. The design
of this stem was based on the well-proven Exeter Total Hip Replacement
stem (ETHRS). This study assessed the surface finish of the ETS
in comparison with the ETHRS. Two ETSs and two ETHRSs were examined
using a profilometer with a precision of 1 nm and compared with
an explanted Exeter Matt stem. The mean roughness average (RA) of
the ETSs was approximately ten times higher than that of the ETHRSs (0.235 μm
(0.095 to 0.452) versus 0.025 μm (0.011 to 0.059);
p <
0.001). The historical Exeter Matt stem roughness measured
a mean RA of 0.973 μm (0.658 to 1.159). The change of the polished
Exeter stem to a matt surface finish in 1976 resulted in a high
stem failure rate. We do not yet know whether the surface differences
between
Aims. Several different designs of hemiarthroplasty are used to treat intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur, with large variations in costs. No clinical benefit of modular over monoblock designs has been reported in the literature. Long-term data are lacking. The aim of this study was to report the ten-year implant survival of commonly used designs of hemiarthroplasty. Methods. Patients recorded by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) between 1 September 1999 and 31 December 2020 who underwent hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of a hip fracture with the following implants were included: a cemented monoblock Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS), cemented Exeter V40 with a bipolar head, a monoblock Thompsons prosthesis (Cobalt/Chromium or Titanium), and an Exeter V40 with a Unitrax head. Overall and age-defined cumulative revision rates were compared over the ten years following surgery. Results. A total of 41,949 hemiarthroplasties were included. Exeter V40 with a Unitrax head was the most commonly used (n = 20,707, 49.4%). The overall rate of revision was small. A total of 28,201 patients (67.2%) were aged > 80 years. There were no significant differences in revision rates across all designs of hemiarthroplasty in patients of this age at any time. The revision rates for all designs were < 3.5%, three years postoperatively. At subsequent times the
