Aims. Our purpose was to determine the quality of current randomised
controlled trials (RCTs) in hand surgery using standardised metrics. Materials and Methods. Based on five-year mean impact factors, we selected the six journals
that routinely publish studies of upper extremity surgery. Using
a journal-specific search query, 62 RCTs met our inclusion criteria.
Then three blinded reviewers used the Jadad and revised Coleman Methodology
Score (RCMS) to assess the quality of the manuscripts. Results. Based on the Jadad scale, 28 studies were of high quality and
34 were of low quality. Methodological
We compared the ceiling effects of two patient-rating
scores, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a physician-rating score,
the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) in assessing the outcome of
surgical treatment of an unstable distal radial fracture. A total
of 77 women with a mean age of 64.2 years (50 to 88) who underwent
fixation using a volar locking plate for an unstable distal radial fracture
between 2011 and 2013 were enrolled in this study. All completed
the DASH and PRWE questionnaires one year post-operatively and were
assessed using the MMWS by the senior author. The ceiling effects
in the outcome data assessed for each score were estimated. The data assessed with both patient-rating scores, the DASH and
PRWE, showed substantial ceiling effects, whereas the data assessed
with MMWS showed no ceiling effect. Researchers should be aware of a possible ceiling effect in the
assessment of the outcome of the surgical treatment of distal radial
fractures using patient-rating scores. It could also increase the
likelihood of a type II error. Cite this article:
