We systematically reviewed all the evidence published
in the English language on proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ)
replacement, to determine its effectiveness on the function of the
hand and the associated post-operative complications. Original studies were selected if they reported clinical outcome
with a minimum of one year’s follow-up. Quality was assessed using
the Cowley systematic review criteria modified for finger-joint
replacements. Of 319 articles identified, only five were adequately
reported according to our quality criteria; there were no randomised
controlled trials. PIPJ replacements had a substantial effect size
on hand pain of -23.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) -27.3 to -19.1)
and grip strength 1.2 (95% CI -10.7 to 13.1), and a small effect
on range of movement 0.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 0.8). A dorsal approach
was most successful. Post-operative loosening occurred in 10% (95%
CI 3 to 30) of ceramic and 12.5% (95% CI 7 to 21) of pyrocarbon
replacements. Post-operative complications occurred in 27.8% (95%
CI 20 to 37). We conclude that the effectiveness of PIPJ replacement has not
been established. Small observational case studies and short-term
follow-up, together with insufficient reporting of patient data,
functional outcomes and complications, limit the value of current
evidence. We recommend that a defined
