Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture, which leads to femoral joint line elevation. There is a paucity of data describing the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion stability and knee kinematics. Thus, the goal of this study was to quantify the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion laxity. Six computational knee models with cadaver-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was created in each model to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of + 2 mm and + 4 mm were then simulated for each knee. The knee models were then extended under a standard moment. Subsequently, varus and valgus moments of 10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at baseline and repeated after each of the two distal resections. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective maximum moments) was measured throughout flexion.Aims
Methods
A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted to compare directly volumetric wear of retrieved polyethylene inserts to predicted volumetric wear modelled from individual gait mechanics of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. In total, 11 retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts were matched with gait analysis testing performed on those patients. Volumetric wear on the articular surfaces was measured using a laser coordinate measure machine and autonomous reconstruction. Knee kinematics and kinetics from individual gait trials drove computational models to calculate medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact paths and forces. Sliding distance along the contact path, normal forces and implantation time were used as inputs to Archard’s equation of wear to predict volumetric wear from gait mechanics. Measured and modelled wear were compared for each component.Aims
Methods
Patellofemoral complications are common after
total knee replacement (TKR). Leaving the patellar unsurfaced after
TKR may lead to complications such as anterior knee pain, and re-operation
to surface it. Complications after patellar resurfacing include
patellar fracture, aseptic loosening, patellar instability, polyethylene
wear, patellar clunk and osteonecrosis. Historically, patellar complications
account for one of the larger proportions of causes of failure in
TKR, however, with contemporary implant designs, complication rates
have decreased. Most remaining failures relate to patellofemoral
tracking. Understanding the causes of patellofemoral maltracking
is essential to prevent these complications as well as manage them
when they occur. Cite this article:
