We have evaluated four different fixation techniques for the reconstruction of a standard Mason type-III fracture of the radial head in a sawbone model. The outcome measurements were the quality of the reduction, and stability.

A total of 96 fractures was created. Six surgeons were involved in the study and each reconstructed 16 fractures with 1.6 mm fine-threaded wires (Fragment Fixation System (FFS)), T-miniplates, 2 mm miniscrews and 2 mm Kirschner (K-) wires; four fractures being allocated to each method using a standard reconstruction procedure.

The quality of the reduction was measured after definitive fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed using a transverse plane shear load in two directions to the implants (parallel and perpendicular) with respect to ultimate failure load and displacement at 50 N.

A significantly better quality of reduction was achieved using the FFS wires (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) than with the other devices with a mean step in the articular surface and the radial neck of 1.04 mm (sd 0.96) for the FFS, 4.25 mm (sd 1.29) for the miniplates, 2.21 mm (sd 1.06) for the miniscrews and 2.54 mm (sd 0.98) for the K-wires. The quality of reduction was similar for K-wires and miniscrews, but poor for miniplates.

The ultimate failure load was similar for the FFS wires (parallel, 196.8 N (sd 46.8), perpendicular, 212.5 N (sd 25.6)), miniscrews (parallel, 211.8 N (sd 47.9), perpendicular, 208.0 N (sd 65.9)) and K-wires (parallel, 200.4 N (sd 54.5), perpendicular, 165.2 N (sd 37.9)), but significantly worse (Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001) for the miniplates (parallel, 101.6 N (sd 43.1), perpendicular, 122.7 N (sd 40.7)). There was a significant difference in the displacement at 50 N for the miniplate (parallel, 4.8 mm (sd 2.8), perpendicular, 4.8 mm (sd 1.7)) vs FFS (parallel, 2.1 mm (sd 0.8), perpendicular, 1.9 mm (sd 0.7)), miniscrews (parallel, 1.8 mm (sd 0.5), perpendicular, 2.3 mm (sd 0.8)) and K-wires (parallel, 2.2 mm (sd 1.8), perpendicular, 2.4 mm (sd 0.7; Tukey’s post hoc tests, p < 0.001)).

The fixation of a standard Mason type-III fracture in a sawbone model using the FFS system provides a better quality of reduction than that when using conventional techniques. There was a significantly better stability using FFS implants, miniscrews and K-wires than when using miniplates.

One of the most controversial issues in total knee replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. In order to determine the effects of different designs of femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint, five different knee prostheses were investigated. These were Low Contact Stress, the Miller-Galante II, the NexGen, the Porous-Coated Anatomic, and the Total Condylar prostheses. Three-dimensional models of the prostheses and a native patella were developed and assessed by computer. The conformity of the curvature of the five different prosthetic femoral components to their corresponding patellar implants and to the native patella at different angles of flexion was assessed by measuring the angles of intersection of tangential lines.

The Total Condylar prosthesis had the lowest conformity with the native patella (mean 8.58°; 0.14° to 29.9°) and with its own patellar component (mean 11.36°; 0.55° to 39.19°). In the other four prostheses, the conformity was better (mean 2.25°; 0.02° to 10.52°) when articulated with the corresponding patellar component. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component showed better conformity (mean 6.51°; 0.07° to 9.89°) than the Miller-Galante II prosthesis (mean 11.20°; 5.80° to 16.72°) when tested with the native patella. Although the Nexgen prosthesis had less conformity with the native patella at a low angle of flexion, this improved at mid (mean 3.57°; 1.40° to 4.56°) or high angles of flexion (mean 4.54°; 0.91° to 9.39°), respectively. The Low Contact Stress femoral component had the best conformity with the native patella (mean 2.39°; 0.04° to 4.56°). There was no significant difference (p > 0.208) between the conformity when tested with the native patella or its own patellar component at any angle of flexion.

The geometry of the anterior flange of a femoral component affects the conformity of the patellofemoral joint when articulating with the native patella. A more anatomical design of femoral component is preferable if the surgeon decides not to resurface the patella at the time of operation.

This study evaluated the effect on movement under load of three different techniques for re-attachment of the tuberosities of the humerus using test sawbones. In the first, the tuberosities were attached both to the shaft and to each other, with one cerclage suture through the anterior hole in the prosthesis. The second technique was identical except for omission of the cerclage suture and in the third the tuberosities were attached to the prosthesis and to the shaft. An orthogonal photogrammetric system allowed all segments to be tracked in a 3D axis system. The humeri were incrementally-loaded in abduction, and the 3D linear and angular movements of all segments were calculated. Displacement between the tuberosities and the shaft was measured.

The first and second techniques were the most stable constructs, with the third allowing greater separation of fragments and angular movement. Separation at the midpoint of the tuberosities was significantly greater using the latter technique (p < 0.05). The cerclage suture added no further stability to the fixation.

We used a canine intercalary bone defect model to determine the effects of recombinant human osteogenic protein 1 (rhOP-1) on allograft incorporation. The allograft was treated with an implant made up of rhOP-1 and type I collagen or with type I collagen alone.

Radiographic analysis showed an increased volume of periosteal callus in both test groups compared with the control group at weeks 4, 6, 8 and 10. Mechanical testing after 12 weeks revealed increased maximal torque and stiffness in the rhOP-1 treated groups compared with the control group.

These results indicate a benefit from the use of an rhOP-1 implant in the healing of bone allografts. The effect was independent of the position of the implant. There may be a beneficial clinical application for this treatment.