We aimed to compare reoperations following distal radial fractures (DRFs) managed with early fixation versus delayed fixation following initial closed reduction (CR). We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to identify DRF patients aged 18 years or older from 2003 to 2016. We used procedural and fee codes within 30 days to determine which patients underwent early fixation (≤ seven days) or delayed fixation following CR. We grouped patients in the delayed group by their time to definitive fixation (eight to 14 days, 15 to 21 days, and 22 to 30 days). We used intervention and diagnostic codes to identify reoperations within two years. We used multivariable regression to compare the association between early versus delayed fixation and reoperation for all patients and stratified by age (18 to 60 years and > 60 years).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there
is no difference, from the payer perspective, in the cost of treatment
of a distal radial fracture in an elderly patient, aged >
65 years,
between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction (CR). Data relating to the treatment of these injuries in the elderly
between January 2007 and December 2015 were extracted using the
Humana and Medicare Advantage Databases. The primary outcome of
interest was the cost associated with treatment. Secondary analysis included
the cost of common complications. Statistical analysis was performed
using a non-parametric Aims
Materials and Methods
Our purpose was to determine the quality of current randomised
controlled trials (RCTs) in hand surgery using standardised metrics. Based on five-year mean impact factors, we selected the six journals
that routinely publish studies of upper extremity surgery. Using
a journal-specific search query, 62 RCTs met our inclusion criteria.
Then three blinded reviewers used the Jadad and revised Coleman Methodology
Score (RCMS) to assess the quality of the manuscripts.Aims
Materials and Methods
