During revision procedures for aseptic reasons, there remains a suspicion that failure may have been the result of an undetected subclinical infection. However, there is little evidence available in the literature about unexpected positive results in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery. The aims of our study were to estimate the prevalence of unexpected positive culture using sonication and to evaluate clinical characteristics of these patients. All patients who underwent a revision surgery after instrumented spinal surgery at our institution between July 2014 and August 2016 with spinal implants submitted for sonication were retrospectively analyzed. Only revisions presumed as aseptic are included in the study. During the study period, 204 spinal revisions were performed for diagnoses other than infection. In 38 cases, sonication cultures were not obtained, leaving a study cohort of 166 cases. The mean age of the cohort was 61.5 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential
application of povidone iodine-alcohol (PVI) followed by chlorhexidine
gluconate-alcohol (CHG) would reduce surgical wound contamination
to a greater extent than PVI applied twice in patients undergoing
spinal surgery. A single-centre, interventional, two arm, parallel group randomised
controlled trial was undertaken, involving 407 patients who underwent
elective spinal surgery. For 203 patients, the skin was disinfected before surgery using
PVI (10% [w/w (1% w/w available iodine)] in 95% industrial denatured
alcohol, povidone iodine; Videne Alcoholic Tincture) twice, and
for 204 patients using PVI once followed by CHG (2% [w/v] chlorhexidine
gluconate in 70% [v/v] isopropyl alcohol; Chloraprep with tint).
The primary outcome measure was contamination of the wound determined
by aerobic and anaerobic bacterial growth from samples taken after
disinfection.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study evaluates the long-term survival of
spinal implants after surgical site infection (SSI) and the risk
factors associated with treatment failure. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out on 43 patients
who had undergone a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation
between January 2006 and December 2008, and who consecutively developed
an acute deep surgical site infection. All were appropriately treated
by surgical debridement with a tailored antibiotic program based
on culture results for a minimum of eight weeks. A ‘terminal event’ or failure of treatment was defined as implant
removal or death related to the SSI. The mean follow-up was 26 months
(1.03 to 50.9). A total of ten patients (23.3%) had a terminal event.
The rate of survival after the first debridement was 90.7% (95%
confidence interval (CI) 82.95 to 98.24) at six months, 85.4% (95%
CI 74.64 to 96.18) at one year, and 73.2% (95% CI 58.70 to 87.78)
at two, three and four years. Four of nine patients required re-instrumentation
after implant removal, and two of the four had a recurrent infection
at the surgical site. There was one recurrence after implant removal
without re-instrumentation. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant risk of treatment
failure in patients who developed sepsis (hazard ratio (HR) 12.5
(95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6 to 59.9); p <
0.001) or who
had >
three fused segments (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.25 to 24.05); p = 0.03).
Implant survival is seriously compromised even after properly treated
surgical site infection, but progressively decreases over the first
24 months. Cite this article:
Between January 1990 and December 2000 we carried out 226 SB Charité III disc replacements for lumbar disc degeneration in 160 patients. They were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 79 months (31 to 161) to determine the clinical and radiological outcome. The clinical results were collected by an independent observer, who was not involved in patient selection, treatment or follow-up, using a combination of outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index. Pain was recorded using a visual analogue score, and the most recent radiographs were reviewed. Survival of the device was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and showed a cumulative survival of 35% at 156 months when radiological failure was taken as the endpoint. The mean improvement in the Oswestry disability index scores after disc replacement was 14% (6% to 21%) and the mean improvement in the pain score was 1.6 (0.46 to 2.73), both falling below the clinically significant threshold. Removal of the implant was required in 12 patients, four because of implant failure. These poor results indicate that further use of this implant is not justified.
We studied 15 patients with healed tuberculosis of the spine and a resultant kyphosis. We selected only those with no neurological deficit and performed a wedge resection of the vertebra using a transpedicular approach. The wedge was removed from the apex of the deformity. For those with a neurological deficit, we chose the conventional anterior debridement and decompression with 360° circumferential fusion. At a mean follow-up of 26.8 months (8 to 46) the outcome was good with an increase in the mean Oswestry Disability Index from 56.26 (48 to 62) pre-operatively to 11.2 (6 to 16) at the latest follow-up.
