Acute and chronic injuries of the interosseus membrane can result in longitudinal instability of the forearm. Reconstruction of the central band of the interosseus membrane can help to restore biomechanical stability. Different methods have been used to reconstruct the central band, including tendon grafts, bone-ligament-bone grafts, and synthetic grafts. This Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Long-term (IDEAL) phase 1 study aims to review the clinical results of reconstruction using a synthetic braided cross-linked graft secured at either end with an Endobutton to restore the force balance between the bones of the forearm. An independent retrospective review was conducted of a consecutive series of 21 patients with longitudinal instability injuries treated with anatomical central band reconstruction between February 2011 and July 2019. Patients with less than 12 months’ follow-up or who were treated acutely were excluded, leaving 18 patients in total. Preoperative clinical and radiological assessments were compared with prospectively gathered data using range of motion and the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) functional outcome score.Aims
Methods
To evaluate the outcomes of terrible triad injuries (TTIs) in mid-term follow-up and determine whether surgical treatment of the radial head influences clinical and radiological outcomes. Follow-up assessment of 88 patients with TTI (48 women, 40 men; mean age 57 years (18 to 82)) was performed after a mean of 4.5 years (2.0 to 9.4). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were evaluated. Radiographs of all patients were analyzed. Fracture types included 13 Mason type I, 16 type II, and 59 type III. Surgical treatment consisted of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in all type II and reconstructable type III fractures, while radial head arthroplasty (RHA) was performed if reconstruction was not possible.Aims
Methods
It has been hypothesized that proximal radial neck resorption (PRNR) following press-fit radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is due to stress-shielding. We compared two different press-fit stems by means of radiographs to investigate whether the shape and size of the stems are correlated with the degree of PRNR. The radiographs of 52 RHAs were analyzed both at 14 days postoperatively and after two years. A cylindrical stem and a conical stem were implanted in 22 patients (group 1) and 30 patients (group 2), respectively. The PRNR was measured in the four quadrants of the radial neck and the degree of stem filling was calculated by analyzing the ratio between the prosthetic stem diameter (PSD) and the medullary canal diameter (MCD) at the proximal portion of the stem (level A), halfway along the stem length (level B), and distally at the stem tip (level C).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to analyze the results of two radiocapitellar prostheses in a large case series followed prospectively, with medium-term follow-up. A total of 31 patients with a mean age of 54 years (27 to 73) were analyzed; nine had primary osteoarthritis (OA) and 17 had post-traumatic OA, three had capitellar osteonecrosis, and two had a fracture. Overall, 17 Lateral Resurfacing Elbow (LRE) and 14 Uni-Elbow Radio-Capitellum Implant (UNI-E) arthroplasties were performed. Pre- and postoperative assessment involved the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) score, and the modified American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (m-ASES) score.Aims
Patients and Methods
In this study we evaluated whether the Instability
Severity Index Score (ISIS) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability
Index (WOSI) could detect those patients at risk of failure following
arthroscopic Bankart repair. Between April 2008 and June 2010, the
ISIS and WOSI were recorded pre-operatively in 110 patients (87
male, 79%) with a mean age of 25.1 years (16 to 61) who underwent
this procedure for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. A telephone interview was performed two-years post-operatively
to determine whether patients had experienced a recurrent dislocation
and whether they had returned to pre-injury activity levels. In
all, six (5%) patients had an ISIS >
6 points (0 to 9). Of 100 (91%)
patients available two years post-operatively, six (6%) had a recurrent dislocation,
and 28 (28%) did not return to pre-injury activity. No patient who
dislocated had an ISIS >
6 (p = 1.0). There was no difference in
the mean pre-operative WOSI in those who had a re-dislocation and
those who did not (p = 0.99). The pre-operative WOSI was significantly
lower (p = 0.02) in those who did not return to pre-injury activity, whereas
the ISIS was not associated with return to pre-injury activity (p
= 0.13). In conclusion, neither the pre-operative ISIS nor WOSI predicted
recurrent dislocation within two years of arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Patients with a lower pre-operative WOSI were less likely to return
to pre-injury activity. Cite this article:
The natural history of primary anterior dislocation
of the glenohumeral joint in adolescent patients remains unclear and
there is no consensus for management of these patients. The objectives of this study were to report the natural history
of primary anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint in adolescent
patients and to identify the risk factors for recurrent dislocation. We reviewed prospectively-collected clinical and radiological
data on 133 adolescent patients diagnosed with a primary anterior
dislocation of the glenohumeral joint who had been managed non-operatively
at our hospital between 1996 and 2008. There were 115 male (86.5%)
and 18 female patients (13.5%) with a mean age of 16.3 years (13
to 18) and a mean follow-up of 95.2 months (1 to 215). During follow-up, 102 (absolute incidence of 76.7%) patients
had a recurrent dislocation. The median interval between primary
and recurrent dislocation was ten months (95% CI 7.4 to 12.6). Applying
survival analysis the likelihood of having a stable shoulder one
year after the initial injury was 59% (95% CI 51.2 to 66.8), 38%
(95% CI 30.2 to 45.8%) after two years, 21% (95% CI 13.2 to 28.8)
after five years, and 7% (95% CI 1.1 to 12.9) after ten years. Neither
age nor gender significantly predicted recurrent dislocation during
follow-up. We conclude that adolescent patients with a primary anterior
dislocation of the glenohumeral joint have a high rate of recurrent
dislocation, which usually occurs within two years of their initial
injury: these patients should be considered for early operative
stabilisation. Cite this article:
