This study explores data quality in operation type and fracture classification recorded as part of a large research study and a national audit with an independent review. At 17 centres, an expert surgeon reviewed a randomly selected subset of cases from their centre with regard to fracture classification using the AO system and type of operation performed. Agreement for these variables was then compared with the data collected during conduct of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE) cohort study. Both types of surgery and fracture classification were collapsed to identify the level of detail of reporting that achieved meaningful agreement. In the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), the types of operation and fracture classification were explored to identify the proportion of “highly improbable” combinations.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological
outcomes in patients with a displaced fracture of the hip who were
treated with a cemented or a cementless femoral stem. A four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study included
141 patients who underwent surgery for a displaced femoral neck
fracture. Patients were randomized to receive either a cemented
(n = 67) or a cementless (n = 74) stem at hemiarthroplasty (HA;
n = 83) or total hip arthroplasty (THA; n = 58).Aims
Patients and Methods
United Kingdom National Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence guidelines recommend the use of total hip replacement
(THR) for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck
in cognitively intact patients, who were independently mobile prior
to the injury. This study aimed to analyse the risk factors associated
with revision of the implant and mortality following THR, and to
quantify risk. National Joint Registry data recording a THR performed
for acute fracture of the femoral neck between 2003 and 2010 were
analysed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate
the extent to which risk of revision was related to specific covariates.
Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse factors affecting
peri-operative mortality (<
90 days). A total of 4323 procedures
were studied. There were 80 patients who had undergone revision
surgery at the time of censoring (five-year revision rate 3.25%, 95%
confidence interval 2.44 to 4.07) and 137 patients (3.2%) patients
died within 90 days. After adjusting for patient and surgeon characteristics,
an increased risk of revision was associated with the use of cementless
prostheses compared with cemented (hazard ratio (HR) 1.33, p = 0.021).
Revision was independent of bearing surface and head size. The risk
of mortality within 90 days was significantly increased with higher
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (grade 3: odds
ratio (OR) 4.04, p <
0.001; grade 4/5: OR 20.26, p <
0.001;
both compared with grades 1/2) and older age (≥ 75 years: OR 1.65,
p = 0.025), but reduced over the study period (9% relative risk reduction
per year). THR is a good option in patients aged <
75 years and with
ASA 1/2. Cementation of the femoral component does not adversely
affect peri-operative mortality but improves survival of the implant
in the mid-term when compared with cementless femoral components.
There are no benefits of using head sizes >
28 mm or bearings other
than metal-on-polyethylene. More research is required to determine
the benefits of THR over hemiarthroplasty in older patients and
those with ASA grades >
2.
