Higher osteoblastic bone activity is expected in aseptic loosening and painful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, insights into normal bone activity patterns after medial UKAs are lacking. The aim of this study was to identify the evolution in bone activity pattern in well-functioning medial mobile-bearing UKAs. In total, 34 patients (13 female, 21 male; mean age 62 years (41 to 79); BMI 29.7 kg/m2 (23.6 to 42.1)) with 38 medial Oxford partial UKAs (20 left, 18 right; 19 cementless, 14 cemented, and five hybrid) were prospectively followed with sequential 99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT preoperatively, and at one and two years postoperatively. Changes in mean osteoblastic activity were investigated using a tracer localization scheme with volumes of interest (VOIs), reported by normalized mean tracer values. A SPECT/CT registration platform additionally explored cortical tracer evolution in zones of interest identified by previous experimental research.Aims
Methods
Recent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs have featured more anatomical morphologies and shorter tibial keels. However, several reports have raised concerns about the impact of these modifications on implant longevity. The aim of this study was to report the early performance of a modern, cemented TKA design. All patients who received a primary, cemented TKA between 2012 and 2017 with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. The implant investigated features an asymmetrical tibial baseplate and shortened keel. Patient demographic details, Knee Society Scores (KSS), component alignment, and the presence of radiolucent lines at final follow-up were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate survivorship.Aims
Methods
This study aims to determine the proportion of patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) possibly suitable for partial (PKA) or combined partial knee arthroplasty (CPKA) according to patterns of full-thickness cartilage loss and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) status. A cross-sectional analysis of 300 consecutive patients (mean age 69 years (SD 9.5, 44 to 91), mean body mass index (BMI) 30.6 (SD 5.5, 20 to 53), 178 female (59.3%)) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 3 knee OA was conducted. The point of maximal tibial bone loss on preoperative lateral radiographs was determined as a percentage of the tibial diameter. At surgery, Lachman’s test and ACL status were recorded. The presence of full-thickness cartilage loss within 16 articular surface regions (two patella, eight femoral, six tibial) was recorded.Aims
Methods
Stems improve the mechanical stability of tibial
components in total knee replacement (TKR), but come at a cost of stress
shielding along their length. Their advantages include resistance
to shear, reduced tibial lift-off and increased stability by reducing
micromotion. Longer stems may have disadvantages including stress
shielding along the length of the stem with associated reduction
in bone density and a theoretical risk of subsidence and loosening, peri-prosthetic
fracture and end-of-stem pain. These features make long stems unattractive
in the primary TKR setting, but often desirable in revision surgery
with bone loss and instability. In the revision scenario, stems
are beneficial in order to convey structural stability to the construct
and protect the reconstruction of bony defects. Cemented and uncemented
long stemmed implants have different roles depending on the nature
of the bone loss involved. This review discusses the biomechanics of the design of tibial
components and stems to inform the selection of the component and
the technique of implantation.
As many as 25% to 40% of unicompartmental knee
replacement (UKR) revisions are performed for pain, a possible cause
of which is proximal tibial strain. The aim of this study was to
examine the effect of UKR implant design and material on cortical
and cancellous proximal tibial strain in a synthetic bone model.
Composite Sawbone tibiae were implanted with cemented UKR components
of different designs, either all-polyethylene or metal-backed. The tibiae
were subsequently loaded in 500 N increments to 2500 N, unloading
between increments. Cortical surface strain was measured using a
digital image correlation technique. Cancellous damage was measured
using acoustic emission, an engineering technique that detects sonic
waves (‘hits’) produced when damage occurs in material. Anteromedial cortical surface strain showed significant differences
between implants at 1500 N and 2500 N in the proximal 10 mm only
(p <
0.001), with relative strain shielding in metal-backed implants.
Acoustic emission showed significant differences in cancellous bone
damage between implants at all loads (p = 0.001). All-polyethylene implants
displayed 16.6 times the total number of cumulative acoustic emission
hits as controls. All-polyethylene implants also displayed more
hits than controls at all loads (p <
0.001), more than metal-backed
implants at loads ≥ 1500 N (p <
0.001), and greater acoustic
emission activity on unloading than controls (p = 0.01), reflecting
a lack of implant stiffness. All-polyethylene implants were associated
with a significant increase in damage at the microscopic level compared
with metal-backed implants, even at low loads. All-polyethylene
implants should be used with caution in patients who are likely
to impose large loads across their knee joint. Cite this article:
The optimum cementing technique for the tibial
component in cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) remains
controversial. The technique of cementing, the volume of cement
and the penetration are largely dependent on the operator, and hence
large variations can occur. Clinical, experimental and computational
studies have been performed, with conflicting results. Early implant
migration is an indication of loosening. Aseptic loosening is the
most common cause of failure in primary TKR and is the product of
several factors. Sufficient penetration of cement has been shown
to increase implant stability. This review discusses the relevant literature regarding all aspects
of the cementing of the tibial component at primary TKR. Cite this article:
