Proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacements (PFEPRs) are the most common reconstruction option for osseous defects following primary and metastatic tumour resection. This study aimed to compare the rate of implant failure between PFEPRs with monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties and acetabular arthroplasties, and determine the optimum articulation for revision PFEPRs. This is a retrospective review of 233 patients who underwent PFEPR. The mean age was 54.7 years (SD 18.2), and 99 (42.5%) were male. There were 90 patients with primary bone tumours (38.6%), 122 with metastatic bone disease (52.4%), and 21 with haematological malignancy (9.0%). A total of 128 patients had monopolar (54.9%), 74 had bipolar hemiarthroplasty heads (31.8%), and 31 underwent acetabular arthroplasty (13.3%).Aims
Methods
Opinion remains divided as to whether the development
of pathological fracture affects the prognosis of patients with
an osteosarcoma of the extremities. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
of papers which reported the outcomes of osteosarcoma patients with
and without a pathological fracture. There were eight eligible papers
for final analysis which reported on 1713 patients, of whom 303
(17.7%) had a pathological fracture. The mean age for 1464 patients in
six studies was 23.2 years old (2 to 82). The mean follow-up for
1481 patients in seven studies was 90.1 months (6 to 240). The pooled estimates of local recurrence rates in osteosarcoma
patients with and without pathological fractures were 14.4% (8.7
to 20.0) The development of a pathological fracture is a negative prognostic
indicator in osteosarcoma and is associated with a reduced five-year
event-free survival and a possibly higher rate of local recurrence.
Our findings suggest that there is no absolute indication for amputation,
as similar rates of local recurrence can be achieved in patients
who are carefully selected for limb salvage. Cite this article:
