There are many guidelines that help direct the management of
patients with metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasties. We have undertaken
a study to compare the management of patients with MOM hip arthroplasties in
different countries. Six international tertiary referral orthopaedic centres were
invited to participate by organising a multi-disciplinary team (MDT)
meeting, consisting of two or more revision hip arthroplasty surgeons
and a musculoskeletal radiologist. A full clinical dataset including
history, blood tests and imaging for ten patients was sent to each
unit, for discussion and treatment planning. Differences in the
interpretation of findings, management decisions and rationale for
decisions were compared using quantitative and qualitative methods.Aims
Methods
There is an increased risk of fracture following
osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement
(FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head–neck junction
has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures
have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated
the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head–neck
junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control,
10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was
applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection
at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison
groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture
between the control group and the 10% resection group (p <
0.001).
The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before
failure (p <
0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection
(p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between
the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head–neck
junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity
of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone,
there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the
amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral
femoral head–neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify
their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to
minimise the subsequent fracture risk. Cite this article:
We report the findings of an independent review
of 230 consecutive Birmingham hip resurfacings (BHRs) in 213 patients
(230 hips) at a mean follow-up of 10.4 years (9.6 to 11.7). A total
of 11 hips underwent revision; six patients (six hips) died from
unrelated causes; and 13 patients (16 hips) were lost to follow-up.
The survival rate for the whole cohort was 94.5% (95% confidence
interval (CI) 90.1 to 96.9). The survival rate in women was 89.1%
(95% CI 79.2 to 94.4) and in men was 97.5% (95% CI 92.4 to 99.2).
Women were 1.4 times more likely to suffer failure than men. For
each millimetre increase in component size there was a 19% lower
chance of a failure. The mean Oxford hip score was 45.0 (median
47.0, 28 to 48); mean University of California, Los Angeles activity
score was 7.4 (median 8.0, 3 to 9); mean patient satisfaction score
was 1.4 (median 1.0, 0 to 9). A total of eight hips had lysis in
the femoral neck and two hips had acetabular lysis. One hip had
progressive radiological changes around the peg of the femoral component.
There was no evidence of progressive neck narrowing between five
and ten years. Our results confirm that BHR provides good functional outcome
and durability for men, at a mean follow-up of ten years. We are
now reluctant to undertake hip resurfacing in women with this implant.
