Aims. Giant cell tumour of
Cancellous allograft
Aims. We first sought to compare survival for patients treated surgically for solitary and multiple metastases in the appendicular skeleton, and second, to explore the role of complete and incomplete resection (R0 and R1/R2) in patients with a solitary bony metastasis in the appendicular skeleton. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study on a population-based cohort of all adult patients treated surgically for bony metastases of the appendicular skeleton between January 2014 and December 2019. We excluded patients in whom the status of
Aims. Due to its indolent clinical behaviour, the treatment paradigm of atypical cartilaginous tumours (ACTs) in the long
Aims. The preoperative grading of chondrosarcomas of
Aims. This study aimed to compare the performance of survival prediction models for
Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of indocyanine green (ICG) staining of
Aims. Giant cell tumours (GCTs) of the proximal femur are rare, and there is no consensus about the best method of filling the defect left by curettage. In this study, we compared the outcome of using a fibular strut allograft and
Aims. The aims of this study were to analyse the long-term outcome
of vascularised fibular graft (VFG) reconstruction after tumour
resection and to evaluate the usefulness of the method. . Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 49 patients who had undergone resection
of a sarcoma and reconstruction using a VFG between 1988 and 2015.
Their mean follow-up was 98 months (5 to 317). Reconstruction was
with an osteochondral graft (n = 13), intercalary graft (n = 12),
inlay graft (n = 4), or resection arthrodesis (n = 20). We analysed
the oncological and functional outcome, and the rate of bony union
and complications. Results. Five- and ten-year overall survival rates were 89% and 86%, respectively.
Local recurrence occurred in two patients. Eight patients developed
pulmonary metastases. Bone union was achieved in 44 patients (90%).
Fracture occurred in six patients (12%), infection in three (6%),
and nonunion in five (10%). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS)
scores were as follows: osteochondral graft 70%; intercalary graft
73%; inlay graft 89%; and resection arthrodesis 83%. Conclusion. Although associated with a relatively high rate of complications,
each reconstruction method is useful, with a high rate of successful
limb salvage and a good long-term functional outcome. Cite this article:
Aims. Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of
Aims. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications and outcomes of treatment in a series of previously untreated patients with a primary aneurysmal
Aims. The aim of this study was to report the results of custom-made endoprostheses with extracortical plates plus or minus a short, intramedullary stem aimed at preserving the physis after resection of
Aims. The purpose of this study was to report the long-term results of extendable endoprostheses of the humerus in children after the resection of a
Aims. Accurate estimations of the risk of fracture due to metastatic bone disease in the femur is essential in order to avoid both under-treatment and over-treatment of patients with an impending pathological fracture. The purpose of the current retrospective in vivo study was to use CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) to identify a clear quantitative differentiating factor between patients who are at imminent risk of fracturing their femur and those who are not, and to identify the exact location of maximal weakness where the fracture is most likely to occur. Methods. Data were collected on 82 patients with femoral metastatic bone disease, 41 of whom did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A total of 15 had a pathological fracture within six months following the CT scan, and 26 were fracture-free during the five months following the scan. The Mirels score and strain fold ratio (SFR) based on CTFEA was computed for all patients. A SFR value of 1.48 was used as the threshold for a pathological fracture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values for Mirels score and SFR predictions were computed for nine patients who fractured and 24 who did not, as well as a comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC of the ROC curves). Results. The sensitivity of SFR was 100% compared with 88% for the Mirels score, and the specificity of SFR was 67% compared with 38% for the Mirels score. The AUC was 0.905 for SFR compared with 0.578 for the Mirels score (p = 0.008). Conclusion. All the patients who sustained a pathological fracture of the femur had an SFR of > 1.48. CTFEA was far better at predicting the risk of fracture and its location accurately compared with the Mirels score. CTFEA is quick and automated and can be incorporated into the protocol of CT scanners. Cite this article:
We treated 26 patients with 27 aneurysmal
Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the current trends in the estimation of survival and the preferred forms of treatment of pathological fractures among national and international general and oncological orthopaedic surgeons, and to explore whether improvements in the management of these patients could be identified in this way. Materials and Methods. All members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Society (DOS) and the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS) were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire containing 12 cases. Results. A total of 96 of 948 members of the DOS (10.1%; groups 1 and 2) and 33 of 182 members of the EMSOS (18%; group 3) replied. The estimation of survival was accurate by more than 50% of all three groups, if the expected survival was short (< 3 months) or long (> 12 months). General orthopaedic surgeons preferred using an intramedullary nail for fractures of the humerus and femur, irrespective of the expected survival or the origin of primary tumour or the location of the fracture. Oncological orthopaedic surgeons recommended prosthetic reconstruction in patients with a long expected survival. Conclusion. Identifying patients who require centralized care, as opposed to those who can be adequately treated in a regional centre, can improve the management of patients with pathological fractures. This differentiation should be based on the expected survival, the type and extent of the tumour, and the location of the fracture. Cite this article:
Aims. The primary aim of this study was to determine the morbidity
of a tibial strut autograft and characterize the rate of bony union
following its use. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively assessed a series of 104 patients from a single
centre who were treated with a tibial strut autograft of > 5 cm
in length. A total of 30 had a segmental reconstruction with continuity
of
Extracorporeal irradiation of an excised tumour-bearing
segment of
Aims. The aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term outcome
of surgery for