Modular dual mobility (DM) prostheses in which a cobalt-chromium liner is inserted into a titanium acetabular shell ( This was a prospective study of patients between 18 and 65 years of age, with a body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2 and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score > 6, who received a modular cobalt-chromium acetabular liner, highly crosslinked polyethylene mobile bearing, and cementless titanium femoral stem for their primary THA. Patients with a history of renal disease and metal hardware elsewhere in the body were excluded. A total of 43 patients (30 male, 13 female; mean age 52.6 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
Instability continues to be a troublesome complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patient-related risk factors associated with a higher dislocation risk include the preoperative diagnosis, an age of 75 years or older, high body mass index (BMI), a history of alcohol abuse, and neurodegenerative diseases. The goal of this study was to assess the dislocation rate, radiographic outcomes, and complications of patients stratified as high-risk for dislocation who received a dual mobility (DM) bearing in a primary THA at a minimum follow-up of two years. We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of DM THA performed between 2010 and 2014 at our institution (Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York) by a single, high-volume orthopaedic surgeon employing a single prosthesis design (Anatomic Dual Mobility (ADM) Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey). Patient medical records and radiographs were reviewed to confirm the type of implant used, to identify any preoperative risk factors for dislocation, and any complications. Radiographic analysis was performed to assess for signs of osteolysis or remodelling of the acetabulum.Aims
Materials and Methods
Surgeons have commonly used modular femoral heads and stems from
different manufacturers, although this is not recommended by orthopaedic
companies due to the different manufacturing processes. We compared the rate of corrosion and rate of wear at the trunnion/head
taper junction in two groups of retrieved hips; those with mixed
manufacturers (MM) and those from the same manufacturer (SM). We identified 151 retrieved hips with large-diameter cobalt-chromium
heads; 51 of two designs that had been paired with stems from different
manufacturers (MM) and 100 of seven designs paired with stems from
the same manufacturer (SM). We determined the severity of corrosion
with the Goldberg corrosion score and the volume of material loss
at the head/stem junction. We used multivariable statistical analysis
to determine if there was a significant difference between the two
groups. Aims
Materials and Methods
Noise generation has been reported with ceramic-on-ceramic
articulations in total hip replacement (THR). This study evaluated
208 consecutive Delta Motion THRs at a mean follow-up of 21 months
(12 to 35). There were 141 women and 67 men with a mean age of 59
years (22 to 84). Patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically,
and the incidence of noise was determined using a newly described
assessment method. Noise production was examined against range of
movement, ligamentous laxity, patient-reported outcome scores, activity
level and orientation of the acetabular component. There were 143
silent hips (69%), 22 (11%) with noises other than squeaking, 17
(8%) with unreproducible squeaking and 26 (13%) with reproducible
squeaking. Hips with reproducible squeaking had a greater mean range
of movement (p <
0.001) and mean ligament laxity (p = 0.004), smaller
median head size (p = 0.01) and decreased mean acetabular component
inclination (p = 0.02) and anteversion angle (p = 0.02) compared
with the other groups. There was no relationship between squeaking
and age (p = 0.13), height (p = 0.263), weight (p = 0.333), body
mass index (p = 0.643), gender (p = 0.07) or patient outcome score
(p = 0.422). There were no revisions during follow-up. Despite the
surprisingly high incidence of squeaking, all patients remain satisfied
with their hip replacement. Cite this article:
The popularity of cementless total hip replacement
(THR) has surpassed cemented THR in England and Wales. This retrospective
cohort study records survival time to revision following primary
cementless THR with the most common combination (accounting for
almost a third of all cementless THRs), and explores risk factors independently
associated with failure, using data from the National Joint Registry
for England and Wales. Patients with osteoarthritis who had a DePuy
Corail/Pinnacle THR implanted between the establishment of the registry
in 2003 and 31 December 2010 were included within analyses. There
were 35 386 procedures. Cox proportional hazard models were used
to analyse the extent to which the risk of revision was related
to patient, surgeon and implant covariates. The overall rate of
revision at five years was 2.4% (99% confidence interval 2.02 to
2.79). In the final adjusted model, we found that the risk of revision
was significantly higher in patients receiving metal-on-metal (MoM:
hazard ratio (HR) 1.93, p <
0.001) and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings
(CoC: HR 1.55, p = 0.003) compared with the best performing bearing
(metal-on-polyethylene). The risk of revision was also greater for
smaller femoral stems (sizes 8 to 10: HR 1.82, p <
0.001) compared
with mid-range sizes. In a secondary analysis of only patients where body
mass index (BMI) data were available (n = 17 166), BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 significantly
increased the risk of revision (HR 1.55, p = 0.002). The influence
of the bearing on the risk of revision remained significant (MoM:
HR 2.19, p <
0.001; CoC: HR 2.09,
p = 0.001). The risk of revision was independent of age, gender,
head size and offset, shell, liner and stem type, and surgeon characteristics. We found significant differences in failure between bearing surfaces
and femoral stem size after adjustment for a range of covariates
in a large cohort of single-brand cementless THRs. In this study
of procedures performed since 2003, hard bearings had significantly
higher rates of revision, but we found no evidence that head size
had an effect. Patient characteristics, such as BMI and American
Society of Anesthesiologists grade, also influence the survival
of cementless components. Cite this article:
