Hip fractures are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and costs. One strategy for improving outcomes is to incentivize hospitals to provide better quality of care. We aimed to determine whether a pay-for-performance initiative affected hip fracture outcomes in England by using Scotland, which did not participate in the scheme, as a control. We undertook an interrupted time series study with data from all patients aged more than 60 years with a hip fracture in England (2000 to 2018) using the Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC) data set linked to national death registrations. Difference-in-differences (DID) analysis incorporating equivalent data from the Scottish Morbidity Record was used to control for secular trends. The outcomes were 30-day and 365-day mortality, 30-day re-admission, time to operation, and acute length of stay.Aims
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 2989 consecutive
patients with a mean age of 81 (21 to 105) and a female to male
ratio of 5:2 who were admitted to our hip fracture unit between
July 2009 and February 2013. We compared weekday and weekend admission
and weekday and weekend surgery 30-day mortality rates for hip fractures
treated both surgically and conservatively. After adjusting for
confounders, weekend admission was independently and significantly
associated with a rise in 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.4,
95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.9; p = 0.039) for patients
undergoing hip fracture surgery. There was no increase in mortality
associated with weekend surgery (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.7; p =
0.39). All hip fracture patients, whether managed surgically or
conservatively, were more likely to die as an inpatient when admitted
at the weekend (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.80; p = 0.032), despite
our unit having a comparatively low overall inpatient mortality
(8.7%). Hip fracture patients admitted over the weekend appear to
have a greater risk of death despite having a consultant-led service. Cite this article:
Over a five-year period, adult patients with
marginal impaction of acetabular fractures were identified from
a registry of patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction in
two tertiary referral centres. Fractures were classified according
to the system of Judet and Letournel. A topographic classification
to describe the extent of articular impaction was used, dividing
the joint surface into superior, middle and inferior thirds. Demographic information,
hospitalisation and surgery-related complications, functional (EuroQol
5-D) and radiological outcome according to Matta’s criteria were
recorded and analysed. In all, 60 patients (57 men, three women)
with a mean age of 41 years (18 to 72) were available at a mean
follow-up of 48 months (24 to 206). The quality of the reduction
was ‘anatomical’ in 44 hips (73.3%) and ‘imperfect’ in 16 (26.7%).
The originally achieved anatomical reduction was lost in Univariate linear regression analysis of the functional outcome
showed that factors associated with worse pain were increasing age
and an inferior location of the impaction. Elevation of the articular
impaction leads to joint preservation with satisfactory overall
medium-term functional results, but secondary collapse is likely
to occur in some patients. Cite this article: