header advert
Results 1 - 14 of 14
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 1 | Pages 6 - 8
1 Jan 2024
Stevenson J Cool P Ashford R

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(1):6–8.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 8 | Pages 837 - 838
1 Aug 2023
Kelly M McNally SA Dhesi JK


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 7 | Pages 642 - 645
1 Jul 2024
Harris IA Sidhu VS MacDessi SJ Solomon M Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 6 | Pages 1007 - 1008
1 Jun 2021
Johansen A Inman DS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1431 - 1434
1 Nov 2020
Trompeter AJ Furness H Kanakaris NK Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1136 - 1337
1 Sep 2018
Griffin XL McBride D Nnadi C Reed MR Rossiter ND


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 7 | Pages 871 - 874
1 Jul 2015
Breakwell LM Cole AA Birch N Heywood C

The effective capture of outcome measures in the healthcare setting can be traced back to Florence Nightingale’s investigation of the in-patient mortality of soldiers wounded in the Crimean war in the 1850s.

Only relatively recently has the formalised collection of outcomes data into Registries been recognised as valuable in itself.

With the advent of surgeon league tables and a move towards value based health care, individuals are being driven to collect, store and interpret data.

Following the success of the National Joint Registry, the British Association of Spine Surgeons instituted the British Spine Registry. Since its launch in 2012, over 650 users representing the whole surgical team have registered and during this time, more than 27 000 patients have been entered onto the database.

There has been significant publicity regarding the collection of outcome measures after surgery, including patient-reported scores. Over 12 000 forms have been directly entered by patients themselves, with many more entered by the surgical teams.

Questions abound: who should have access to the data produced by the Registry and how should they use it? How should the results be reported and in what forum?

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:871–4.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1427 - 1430
1 Nov 2016
Powell JM Rai A Foy M Casey A Dabke H Gibson A Hutton M

Many hospitals do not have a structured process of consent, the attainment of which can often be rather ‘last-minute’ and somewhat chaotic. This is a surprising state of affairs as spinal surgery is a high-risk surgical specialty with potential for expensive litigation claims. More recently, the Montgomery ruling by the United Kingdom Supreme Court has placed the subject of informed consent into the spotlight.

There is a paucity of practical guidance on how a consent process can be achieved in a busy clinical setting. The British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has convened a working party to address this need. To our knowledge this is the first example of a national professional body, representing a single surgical specialty, taking such a fundamental initiative.

In a hard-pressed clinical environment, the ability to achieve admission reliably on the day of surgery, in patients at ease with their situation and with little likelihood of late cancellation, will be of great benefit. It will reduce litigation and improve the patient experience.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1427–30.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained.

This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1153 - 1155
1 Sep 2013
Timperley AJ Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2015
Haddad FS McCaskie AW

Trauma and Orthopaedic care has been through a rapid evolution over the past few decades. This Editorial discusses some of the advances.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1–2.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1000 - 1001
1 Aug 2014
Griffin XL Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 4 | Pages 433 - 435
1 Apr 2014
Haddad FS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1133 - 1134
1 Sep 2007
Haddad FS Ashby E Konangamparambath S

Due to economic constraints, it has been suggested that joint replacement patients can be followed up in primary care. There are clinical, ethical and academic reasons why we must ensure that our joint replacements are appropriately clinically and radiologically followed up to minimise complications. This Editorial discusses this.