Meniscal allograft transplantation is undertaken to improve pain
and function in patients with a symptomatic meniscal deficient knee
compartment. While case series have shown improvements in patient
reported outcome measures (PROMs), its efficacy has not been rigorously
evaluated. This study aimed to compare PROMs in patients having
meniscal transplantation with those having personalized physiotherapy
at 12 months. A single-centre assessor-blinded, comprehensive cohort study,
incorporating a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed
on patients with a symptomatic compartment of the knee in which
a (sub)total meniscectomy had previously been performed. They were
randomized to be treated either with a meniscal allograft transplantation
or personalized physiotherapy, and stratified for malalignment of
the limb. They entered the preference groups if they were not willing
to be randomized. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS),
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm
score and complications were collected at baseline and at four,
eight and 12 months following the interventions.Aims
Patients and Methods
We undertook a retrospective comparative study
of all patients with an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis presenting
to a single centre between 1998 and 2011. There were 45 patients
(46 hips; mean age 12.6 years; 9 to 14); 16 hips underwent intracapsular
cuneiform osteotomy and 30 underwent pinning Pinning Non-emergency intracapsular osteotomy may have a protective effect
on the epiphyseal vasculature and should be undertaken with a delay
of at least two weeks. The place of emergency pinning Cite this article:
