The critical relationship between airborne microbiological contamination in an operating theatre and surgical site infection (SSI) is well known. The aim of this annotation is to explain the scientific basis of using settle plates to audit the quality of air, and to provide information about the practicalities of using them for the purposes of clinical audit. The microbiological quality of the air in most guidance is defined by volumetric sampling, but this method is difficult for surgical departments to use on a routine basis. Settle plate sampling, which mimics the mechanism of deposition of airborne microbes onto open wounds and sterile instruments, is a good alternative method of assessing the quality of the air. Current practice is not to sample the air in an operating theatre during surgery, but to rely on testing the engineering systems which deliver the clean air. This is, however, not good practice and microbiological testing should be carried out routinely during operations as part of clinical audit.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):887–891.

A comparison was made in a laminar-flow operating room between total-body exhaust gowns and a clothing system made from Fabric 450. This disposable clothing was found to be much more comfortable and convenient than the total-body exhaust gowns. The average airborne bacterial counts obtained during total hip replacement operations from each of the clothing systems were identical when the downflow method of ventilation was used (0.7 per cubic metre) and no significant difference could be demonstrated when the crossflow system was used (2.2 per cubic metre with the total-body exhaust gowns and 3.1 per cubic metre with the disposable clothing). Tests in a dispersal chamber were carried out to find the effectiveness of each item of the disposable clothing in reducing bacterial dispersion. These tests demonstrated the relative ineffectiveness of wearing a surgical gown as compared with wearing the complete system. It was confirmed bacteriologically that the downflow system of ventilation was more efficient than the crossflow type; the importance of this observation with respect to clothing and sepsis is discussed in this paper.