This study compares the cost-effectiveness of
treating dorsally displaced distal radial fractures with a volar
locking plate and percutaneous fixation. It was performed from the
perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) using data from
a single-centre randomised controlled trial. In total 130 patients
(18 to 73 years of age) with a dorsally displaced distal radial
fracture were randomised to treatment with either a volar locking
plate (n = 66) or percutaneous fixation (n = 64). The methodology
was according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance
for technology appraisals. . There were no significant differences in quality of life scores
between groups at any time point in the study. Both groups returned
to baseline one year post-operatively. NHS costs for the plate group were significantly higher (p <
0.001, 95% confidence interval 497 to 930). For an additional £713,
fixation with a volar locking plate offered 0.0178 additional quality-adjusted
life years in the year after surgery. The incremental cost-effectiveness
ratio (ICER) for plate fixation relative to percutaneous fixation
at list price was £40 068. When adjusting the prices of the implants
for a 20% hospital discount, the ICER was £31 898. Patients who
underwent plate fixation did not return to work earlier. We found no evidence to support the cost-effectiveness, from
the perspective of the NHS, of fixation using a volar locking plate
over percutaneous fixation for the operative treatment of a dorsally
displaced radial fracture. Cite this article:
