Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting. Cite this article:
We performed a systematic literature review to define features of patients, treatment, and biological behaviour of multicentric giant cell tumour (GCT) of bone. The search terms used in combination were “multicentric”, “giant cell tumour”, and “bone”. Exclusion criteria were: reports lacking data, with only an abstract; papers not reporting data on multicentric GCT; and papers on multicentric GCT associated with other diseases. Additionally, we report three patients treated under our care.Aims
Methods
Instability of the hip is the most common mode of failure after
reconstruction with a proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) using
an endoprosthesis after excision of a tumour. Small studies report
improved stability with capsular repair of the hip and other techniques,
but these have not been investigated in a large series of patients.
The aim of this study was to evaluate variables associated with
the patient and the operation that affect post-operative stability.
We hypothesised an association between capsular repair and stability. In a retrospective cohort study, we identified 527 adult patients
who were treated with a PFA for tumours. Our data included demographics,
the pathological diagnosis, the amount of resection of the abductor
muscles, the techniques of reconstruction and the characteristics
of the implant. We used regression analysis to compare patients
with and without post-operative instability.Aims
Patients and Methods
Previous classification systems of failure of
limb salvage focused primarily on endoprosthetic failures and lacked sufficient
depth for the effective study of the causes of failure. In order
to address these inadequacies, the International Society of Limb
Salvage (ISOLS) formed a committee to recommend revisions of the
previous systems. The purpose of this study was to report on their
recommendations. The modifications were prepared using an earlier,
evidence-based model with subclassification based on the existing
medical literature. Subclassification for all five primary types
of failure of limb salvage following endoprosthetic reconstruction
were formulated and a complementary system was derived for the failure
of biological reconstruction. An additional classification of failure
in paediatric patients was also described. Limb salvage surgery presents a complex array of potential mechanisms
of failure, and a complete and precise classification of types of
failure is required. Earlier classification systems lacked specificity,
and the evidence-based system outlined here is designed to correct
these weaknesses and to provide a means of reporting failures of
limb salvage in order to allow the interpretation of outcome following
reconstructive surgery. Cite this article:
We retrospectively studied 14 patients with proximal and diaphyseal tumours and disappearing bone (Gorham’s) disease of the humerus treated with wide resection and reconstruction using an allograft-resurfacing composite (ARC). There were ten women and four men, with a mean age of 35 years (8 to 69). At a mean follow-up of 25 months (10 to 89), two patients had a fracture of the allograft. In one of these it was revised with a similar ARC and in the other with an intercalary prosthesis. A further patient had an infection and a fracture of the allograft that was revised with a megaprosthesis. In all patients with an ARC, healing of the ARC-host bone interface was observed. One patient had failure of the locking mechanism of the total elbow replacement. The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for the upper extremity was 77% (46.7% to 86.7%), which represents good and excellent results; one patient had a poor result (46.7%). In the short term ARC effectively relieves pain and restores shoulder function in patients with wide resection of the proximal humerus. Fracture and infection remain significant complications.
We describe 100 consecutive patients with osteoid osteoma. Of the 97 who had operations, 89 were treated by intralesional excision and eight by wide resection. The three remaining patients were not operated on because the osteoid osteoma was almost painless, or was found in the pedicle of the 12th thoracic vertebra at the site of entrance of the artery of Adamkjewicz. The diagnosis was confirmed histologically in all specimens. No local recurrences were observed at a minimum follow-up of one year. All except one patient were mobilised two to four days after surgery. A precise preoperative diagnosis of the lesion is mandatory, based on clinical findings, standard radiographs, thin-section CT and a bone scan. We compared our operative technique with 247 cases in which the percutaneous technique of removal or coagulation of the nidus had been performed. The latter procedure has a less constant rate of primary cure (83%
Chondrosarcomas arising from soft tissues are rare. Two different varieties are described, myxoid and mesenchymal. We have collected nine cases of the tumour, five myxoid and four mesenchymal, from a review of 513 cases of chondrosarcoma seen between 1904 and 1988. We report the principal clinical, radiographical and histological differences between the two varieties and discuss their surgical treatment and prognosis.
