Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1408 - 1415
1 Nov 2019
Hull PD Chou DTS Lewis S Carrothers AD Queally JM Allison A Barton G Costa ML

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, appropriately powered, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing internal fracture fixation and distal femoral replacement (DFR) for distal femoral fractures in older patients.

Patients and Methods

Seven centres recruited patients into the study. Patients were eligible if they were greater than 65 years of age with a distal femoral fracture, and if the surgeon felt that they were suitable for either form of treatment. Outcome measures included the patients’ willingness to participate, clinicians’ willingness to recruit, rates of loss to follow-up, the ability to capture data, estimates of standard deviation to inform the sample size calculation, and the main determinants of cost. The primary clinical outcome measure was the EuroQol five-dimensional index (EQ-5D) at six months following injury.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 82-B, Issue 6 | Pages 934 - 935
1 Aug 2000
Lewis S


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 71-B, Issue 1 | Pages 118 - 120
1 Jan 1989
Lewis S Pozo J Muirhead-Allwood W

We reviewed seven patients with coronal fractures of the lateral femoral condyle and studied the mechanism of injury and the radiological features. The influence of soft tissue attachments on the displacement and the blood supply were investigated by clinical and cadaveric studies. All three fractures which were initially undisplaced lost position early during conservative management. Internal fixation gave good results at review, and is recommended to avoid the risk of malunion and possible secondary osteoarthritis.