The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether
the serum level of interleukin 6 (IL-6) could be used to identify the
persistence of infection after the first stage of a two-stage revision
for periprosthetic joint infection. Between 2010 and 2011, we prospectively studied 55 patients (23
men, 32 women; mean age 69.5 years; 36 to 86) with a periprosthetic
joint infection. Bacteria were identified in two intra-operative
tissue samples during re-implantation in 16 patients. These cases
were classified as representing persistent infection. To calculate a precise cut-off value which could be used in everyday
clinical practice, a 3 x 2 contingency table was constructed and
manually defined. We found that a serum IL-6 ≥ 13 pg/mL can be regarded as indicating
infection: its positive-predictive value is 90.9%. A serum IL-6 ≤ 8
pg/mL can be regarded as indicating an absence of infection: its
negative predictive value is 92.1%. The serum IL-6 level seems to be a reasonable marker for identifying
persistent infection after the first stage of a revision joint arthroplasty
and before attempting re-implantation. Cite this article:
There has been a substantial increase in the
number of hip and knee prostheses implanted in recent years, with
a consequent increase in the number of revisions required. Total
femur replacement (TFR) following destruction of the entire femur,
usually after several previous revision operations, is a rare procedure
but is the only way of avoiding amputation. Intramedullary femur
replacement (IFR) with preservation of the femoral diaphysis is
a modification of TFR. Between 1999 and 2010, 27 patients with non-oncological
conditions underwent surgery in our department with either IFR (n
= 15) or TFR (n = 12) and were included in this study retrospectively.
The aim of the study was to assess the indications, complications
and outcomes of IFR and TFR in revision cases. The mean follow-up
period was 31.3 months (6 to 90). Complications developed in 37%
of cases, 33% in the IFR group and 4% in the TFR group. Despite
a trend towards a slightly better functional outcome compared with
TFR, the indication for intramedullary femur replacement should
be established on a very strict basis in view of the procedure’s
much higher complication rate.
