This study of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip aimed to: 1) characterize the contribution of the hip, spinopelvic complex, and lumbar spine when moving from the standing to the sitting position; 2) assess whether abnormal spinopelvic mobility is associated with worse symptoms; and 3) identify whether spinopelvic mobility can be predicted from static anatomical radiological parameters. A total of 122 patients with end-stage OA of the hip awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA) were prospectively studied. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; Oxford Hip Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Score) and clinical data were collected. Sagittal spinopelvic mobility was calculated as the change from the standing to sitting position using the lumbar lordosis angle (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic-femoral angle (PFA), and acetabular anteinclination (AI) from lateral radiographs. The interaction of the different parameters was assessed. PROMs were compared between patients with normal spinopelvic mobility (10° ≤ ∆PT ≤ 30°) or abnormal spinopelvic mobility (stiff: ∆PT < ± 10°; hypermobile: ∆PT > ± 30°). Multiple regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to test for possible predictors of spinopelvic mobility.Aims
Patients and Methods
The treatment of patients with allergies to metal in total joint arthroplasty is an ongoing debate. Possibilities include the use of hypoallergenic prostheses, as well as the use of standard cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloy. This non-designer study was performed to evaluate the clinical outcome and survival rates of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a standard CoCr alloy in patients reporting signs of a hypersensitivity to metal. A consecutive series of patients suitable for UKA were screened for symptoms of metal hypersensitivity by use of a questionnaire. A total of 82 patients out of 1737 patients suitable for medial UKA reporting cutaneous metal hypersensitivity to cobalt, chromium, or nickel were included into this study and prospectively evaluated to determine the functional outcome, possible signs of hypersensitivity, and short-term survivorship at a minimum follow-up of 1.5 years.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this independent multicentre study was to assess the
mid-term results of mobile bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty
(UKA) for isolated lateral osteoarthritis of the knee joint. We retrospectively evaluated 363 consecutive, lateral UKAs (346
patients) performed using the Oxford domed lateral prosthesis undertaken
in three high-volume knee arthroplasty centres between 2006 and
2014. Mean age of the patients at surgery was 65 years (36 to 88)
with a mean final follow-up of 37 months (12 to 93)Aims
Patients and Methods
The Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee
replacement (UKR) is an effective and safe treatment for osteoarthritis
of the medial compartment. The results in the lateral compartment
have been disappointing due to a high early rate of dislocation
of the bearing. A series using a newly designed domed tibial component
is reported. The first 50 consecutive domed lateral Oxford UKRs in 50 patients
with a mean follow-up of three years (2.0 to 4.3) were included.
Clinical scores were obtained prospectively and Kaplan-Meier survival
analysis was performed for different endpoints. Radiological variables
related to the position and alignment of the components were measured. One patient died and none was lost to follow-up. The cumulative
incidence of dislocation was 6.2% (95% confidence interval (CI)
2.0 to 17.9) at three years. Survival using revision for any reason
and aseptic revision was 94% (95% CI 82 to 98) and 96% (95% CI 85
to 99) at three years, respectively. Outcome scores, visual analogue
scale for pain and maximum knee flexion showed a significant improvement
(p <
0.001). The mean Oxford knee score was 43 ( Clinical results are excellent and short-term survival has improved
when compared with earlier series. The risk of dislocation remains
higher using a mobile-bearing UKR in the lateral compartment when
compared with the medial compartment. Patients should be informed
about this complication. To avoid dislocations, care must be taken
not to elevate the lateral joint line.
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was
to identify any difference in femoral offset as measured on pre-operative
anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the pelvis, AP radiographs of
the hip and corresponding CT scans in a consecutive series of 100
patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip (43 men
and 57 women with a mean age of 61 years (45 to 74) and a mean body
mass index of 28 kg/m2 (20 to 45)). Patients were positioned according to a standardised protocol
to achieve reproducible projection and all images were calibrated.
Inter- and intra-observer reliability was evaluated and agreement
between methods was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. In the entire cohort, the mean femoral offset was 39.0 mm (95%
confidence interval (CI) 37.4 to 40.6) on radiographs of the pelvis,
44.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 45.6) on radiographs of the hip and 44.7
mm (95% CI 43.5 to 45.9) on CT scans. AP radiographs of the pelvis
underestimated femoral offset by 13% when compared with CT (p <
0.001).
No difference in mean femoral offset was seen between AP radiographs
of the hip and CT (p = 0.191). Our results suggest that femoral offset is significantly underestimated
on AP radiographs of the pelvis but can be reliably and accurately
assessed on AP radiographs of the hip in patients with primary end-stage
hip osteoarthritis. We, therefore, recommend that additional AP radiographs of the
hip are obtained routinely for the pre-operative assessment of femoral
offset when templating before total hip replacement.
